VS

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (575 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (56,400 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Mazda CX-80?

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

  • a bit cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

F-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 is a bit cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,072 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar F-Pace uses 1.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Jaguar F-Pace offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 64 km, about 4 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace offers significantly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 248 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar F-Pace delivers visibly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

F-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Jaguar F-Pace is barely lighter – 1,951 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jaguar F-Pace offers considerably more boot space – 470 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 212 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries only slightly more – 650 kg compared to 589 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jaguar F-Pace holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £56,400
F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 575 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.8 - 12 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jaguar F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.

details
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8839
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8069
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8105
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Interior_100321_9682
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Loadspace_100321_5938

Reviews Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Frank
23 Dec 2025, 16:34:38

Really nice car with good multimedia features and a solid sound system. Great for long trips — not tiring to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
BMW X5
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the BMW X5 offers a blend of performance and opulence with its powerful engine options, refined interior, and cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, the new Mazda CX-80 presents a compelling alternative, delivering a spacious yet elegant cabin and Mazda's signature …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Discovery Sport
VS
Jaguar F-Pace and Land Rover Discovery Sport go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
In the competitive landscape of luxury SUVs, the Jaguar F-Pace and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stand out with their distinctive blend of style and performance. The F-Pace impresses with its athletic handling and spacious interior, while the Evoque captivates with its rugged charm and advanced …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
56,400 - 100,800 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
15.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 274 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,951 - 2,230 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
4,747 - 4,762 mm
Length
-
Width
1,936 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,664 - 1,670 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,299 - 1,428 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 589 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 - 5,000 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Jaguar F-Pace have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.