VS

Jeep Avenger vs Skoda Elroq comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Skoda Elroq?

Jeep Avenger vs Skoda Elroq: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Avenger

An Electrifying Face-off: Jeep Avenger vs Skoda Elroq

The electric vehicle (EV) market is buzzing with excitement as two notable SUVs, the Jeep Avenger and the Skoda Elroq, enter the fray. Each brings a unique set of attributes to the table, promising to satisfy different segments of adventurous drivers. Let’s delve into a comprehensive comparison of these electrifying SUVs, focusing on their technical specifications, innovative features, and what sets them apart in the growing EV domain.

Elroq

Power and Performance

The Jeep Avenger offers a diverse range of powertrains, including electric, petrol, and hybrid options. The electric variant delivers 156 HP and a torque of 260 Nm, ensuring a brisk acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 9 seconds and a top speed of 150 km/h. The SUV is available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, providing versatility to cater to various driving preferences.

Contrastingly, the Skoda Elroq is solely available as an electric vehicle, boasting a more powerful performance with options up to 286 HP. It hits 0-100 km/h in a rapid 6.6 seconds, with a top speed of 180 km/h. With its rear-wheel drive, the Elroq promises a dynamic driving experience, maximizing the enjoyment of electric power delivery.

Avenger

Range and Efficiency

For those prioritizing range in an EV, the Jeep Avenger presents a competitive figure with an electric range of 400 km, supplemented by a relatively efficient consumption of 15.4 kWh/100km. This makes it a viable option for those looking for a balance between urban commuting and weekend getaways.

The Skoda Elroq, however, extends its prowess with a remarkable electric range of up to 580 km, complemented by a low consumption of around 15.2 kWh/100km. This advantage makes the Elroq particularly attractive for long-distance travelers looking for uncompromised journey capabilities.

Elroq

Size and Practicality

In terms of dimensions, the Avenger measures 4,084 mm in length, providing a mid-sized SUV feel. Its trunk capacity ranges from 325 to 380 liters, catering to various cargo needs while assuring comfort for up to five passengers. Moreover, its lightweight design, starting at 1,180 kg, aids in nimble maneuverability.

The Elroq, designed as a larger SUV, spans 4,488 mm in length, offering more interior space and an impressive trunk capacity of 470 liters. Despite its generous size, the Elroq strikes a balance with its substantial curb weight of 1,979 kg, ensuring stability and a composed road presence.

Avenger

Innovations and Features

Jeep equips the Avenger with several modern amenities aimed at boosting convenience and safety. These include a cutting-edge infotainment system and advanced driver assistance systems, ensuring that technology-savvy consumers stay connected and secure.

Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq embraces innovation with its state-of-the-art connectivity features and automated driving aids, placing it at the forefront of tech-centric SUVs. Its efficiency is underscored by a zero CO2 emissions footprint, earning it an ‘A’ efficiency class rating.

Elroq

Conclusion: Tailoring to Different Needs

In summation, the choice between the Jeep Avenger and the Skoda Elroq boils down to individual preferences. The Avenger appeals to those who value versatility and the option of a mixed powertrain in a compact SUV form. On the other hand, the Skoda Elroq stands as a quintessential choice for those who prioritize longer electric range, robust power, and spaciousness in a purely electric format. Both vehicles exemplify significant strides in automotive electrification, ultimately bringing diverse options to drivers worldwide.

Video - Skoda Elroq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Jeep Avenger is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 32,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,506 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Elroq is only slightly more efficient: consuming 15.1 kWh/100km compared to 15.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Avenger. That’s a difference of about 0.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers markedly more range – reaching up to 574 km, about 174 km more than the Jeep Avenger.

Elroq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers significantly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 419 Nm more.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is considerably lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 2,036 kg. The difference is around 856 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers moderately more boot space – 470 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries barely more – 549 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 441 - 574 km
details
Jeep Avenger
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4 (8 Reviews)
rate
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

details
1_skoda_elroq_166e0554
2_skoda_elroq_b393d405
28_skoda_elroq_3a5d05f5

Reviews Skoda Elroq

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
Dirk
16 May 2026, 17:53:06

For me personally, compared directly with the ID4 "GTX", the Elroq is the slightly more mature and better-thought-out car for everyday use. It offers better ride comfort, software that runs a bit more smoothly for me, and by far the nicer design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gerry
15 May 2026, 09:17:17

First electric buy, so glad we chose the Elroq. Everything is so intuitive, car very spacious comfortable and nicely appointed, everything just feels right. Turning circle of 9.3M is so useful for such a largish car. Only small gripe is it's has quite a bit of road noise at 100KPH plus, absolutely fine below .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Caelin
14 May 2026, 14:15:42

EV built for 80 km/h roads; range is very disappointing if you use the highway daily. You won't find this in the specifications. Which means in hindsight it wasn't the right choice.
Comfort fine.
Car catches a lot of wind; a lot of wind noise/whistling.
It's a shame that you have to reset a number of functions every time you start; no automatic memory.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Kay
2 Mar 2026, 11:27:36

We’ve been driving the Elroq 85 Sportline for four weeks. Nice SUV — functional and not overdone. Downside for me: software issues. Infotainment crashed once so far, and the traffic-sign recognition isn’t updating (often shows outdated roadworks).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
ygfg
16 Feb 2026, 01:00:58

yg

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Elroq helps you decide between two different approaches to modern motoring. I’ll focus on range, interior space, driving dynamics, technology and ownership costs so you can pick the one that best matches your priorities.
VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a nimble, hatchback-style EV focused on urban driving or a slightly more spacious, crossover-style model prioritizing practicality. This comparison looks at range, interior space, driving feel and overall value to help …
Hyundai IONIQ 5
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Skoda Elroq offer two distinct takes on the compact electric crossover: the IONIQ 5 shines with bold styling, rapid charging and advanced tech, while the Elroq prioritises practical space, sensible packaging and everyday usability. Your choice will hinge on whether you value …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Packed into a compact electric package, the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers premium polish and slick tech while the Skoda Elroq plays the clever-value card with roomy practicality and a friendlier price tag. Which one should sit in your garage — the status-savvy Q4 e-tron or the no-nonsense Elroq? We’ll …
Toyota bZ4X
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Toyota bZ4X stakes its claim as a sensible, go-anywhere electric with Toyota toughness and straightforward tech, while the Skoda Elroq answers with clever packaging, sharper styling and a dose of European practicality. In this short showdown we’ll cut through badges and specs to tell you which …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Jeep Avenger
VS
Comparing the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Jeep Avenger pits a classic, driver-focused Italian coupe against a contemporary, city-sized crossover built for everyday practicality. If you value vintage charisma and engaging steering, the Junior is instantly appealing; if you prefer modern safety, …
Jeep Avenger
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 35,000 £
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
470 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,884 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
494 - 502 kg
Payload
482 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Skoda
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.