@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Jeep Compass vs Mazda CX-80 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (213 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 48200 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Mazda CX-80?

Jeep Compass

2 (1 Reviews)
rate

Mazda CX-80

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Jeep Compass has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 14014 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 5.80 L. The difference is about 4.20 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Jeep Compass performs convincingly better – achieving up to 500 km, about 439 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a evident edge – offering 327 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8.50 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs somewhat better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls noticeable stronger with 550 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm difference.

Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Jeep Compass is noticeable lighter – 1667 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 464 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Jeep Compass offers convincingly more room – 550 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 292 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs evident better – up to 1971 L, which is about 410 L more than the Jeep Compass.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,200
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details
Jeep Compass
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Compass

2 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.

details
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012 @ Jeep / Stellantis Media

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Reviews Jeep Compass

2 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
Jeep Compass
Mazda CX-80
Compass @ Jeep / Stellantis Media
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
34200 - 43200 £
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.8 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
500 km
Electric Range
61 km
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 133 g/km
co2
35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1667 - 2198 kg
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity
550 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
4552 mm
Length
4995 mm
Width
1928 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1675 mm
Height
1714 mm
Max trunk capacity
1561 L
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Payload
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 213 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Avenger
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Compass
VS
When comparing the Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass, the Avenger stands out with its more compact design, making it ideal for city driving while still offering solid off-road capabilities. In contrast, the Compass delivers a more spacious interior and a smoother ride, appealing to families and …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Compass
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Jeep Compass and the anticipated Dacia Bigster represent two unique approaches to the compact SUV segment. The Compass offers a blend of rugged capability and urban sophistication, boasting advanced off-road features and a plush interior. On the other hand, the Bigster promises an intriguing …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q7
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Duster
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Compass
VS
Dacia Duster and Jeep Compass go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Compass
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Jeep Compass and Volvo XC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Compass have?

The Jeep Compass is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.