Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Mazda CX-80?
Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Compass has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 14014 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 2 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Jeep Compass performs convincingly better – achieving up to 500 km, about 439 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a evident edge – offering 327 HP compared to 240 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 7.30 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs minimal better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 pulls noticeable stronger with 550 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, the Jeep Compass is noticeable lighter – 1575 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 556 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jeep Compass offers convincingly more room – 550 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 292 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs evident better – up to 1971 L, which is about 584 L more than the Jeep Compass.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 noticeable takes the win – 650 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.
Our conclusion: The Mazda CX-80 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and thus becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Overall, Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The Jeep Compass combines a rugged aesthetic with modern sophistication, making it a standout choice in the compact SUV segment. Its robust design is complemented by a comfortable interior that offers ample space and cutting-edge technology for a seamless driving experience. Whether tackling urban environments or venturing off-road, the Compass provides versatility and reliability, embodying the adventurous spirit synonymous with the Jeep brand.
detailsThe Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46900 £
|
Price
48200 - 60200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
36 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
61 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 133 g/km
|
co2
35 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1575 - 2198 kg
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
420 - 550 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
4404 - 4552 mm
|
Length
4995 mm
|
|
Width
1819 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1629 - 1675 mm
|
Height
1714 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1230 - 1387 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
|
|
Payload
465 - 470 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 240 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
96 - 177 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1469 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The Jeep Compass is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.