Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Jeep Compass vs Mazda CX-80 comparison
Compare performance (225 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Mazda CX-80?
Jeep Compass vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Compass
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Compass is considerably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,128 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers substantially more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 440 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
CX-80
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers markedly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm more.
Compass
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is clearly lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 464 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers significantly more boot space – 550 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 292 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 177 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jeep Compass holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Jeep Compass
Jeep Compass
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Jeep Compass
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
472 - 473 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.