Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jeep Compass vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison
Compare performance (225 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Skoda Kodiaq?
Jeep Compass vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Compass
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Compass is moderately cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,677 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers substantially more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 378 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers moderately more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is moderately faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 38 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers somewhat more torque with 400 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.
Compass
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is very slightly lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 17 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 360 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 544 L more than the Jeep Compass.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Jeep Compass
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Jeep Compass
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4,552 mm
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
1,675 mm
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.