Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jeep Compass vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compass
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Compass has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 2648 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 5.80 L. The difference is about 5.40 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Jeep Compass performs significantly better – achieving up to 500 km, about 377 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
Kodiaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a somewhat edge – offering 265 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8.50 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 43 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls a bit stronger with 400 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
Compass
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Jeep Compass is hardly perceptible lighter – 1667 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 17 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 910 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 360 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – up to 2105 L, which is about 544 L more than the Jeep Compass.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £36,800
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
Jeep Compass
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Compass
2 (1 Reviews)
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (1 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Jeep Compass
Skoda Kodiaq
|
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 43200 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.8 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
500 km
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 133 g/km
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1667 - 2198 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4552 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1928 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1675 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Compass have?
The Jeep Compass is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.