Compare performance (225 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Suzuki Vitara?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the increasingly competitive compact SUV market, two models stand out for their blend of style, performance, and advanced technology: the Jeep Compass and the Suzuki Vitara. As we dive into the specifics, we’ll explore how these vehicles compare in several key areas, including engine performance, fuel efficiency, interior space, and innovative features.
The 2024 Jeep Compass offers a range of engine options, including petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) and plug-in hybrid variants, with horsepower ranging from 130 to a mighty 240 HP. This versatile powertrain allows drivers to choose between an efficient front-wheel drive or an all-wheel drive, making it adaptable for a variety of driving conditions. The Compass accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds with its more powerful engine, appealing to those looking for an engaging driving experience.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara features a selection of petrol engines, with power outputs of 116 to 129 HP. Though it doesn’t quite reach the performance heights of the Compass, it maintains an impressive acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 9.5 seconds for its most potent iteration. Both vehicles utilize a four-cylinder layout and offer front-wheel or all-wheel drive setups.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Compass has commendable figures, with consumption rates as low as 2 L/100 km in its hybrid variants. Meanwhile, the Vitara also makes a strong case for fuel economy, with its variants averaging between 5 to 5.6 L/100 km. In terms of emissions, the Compass ranges from 48 to 124 g/km, while the Vitara has a slightly higher range, between 113 to 129 g/km, positioning both cars well within their respective CO2 efficiency classes.
In terms of size, the Jeep Compass is slightly larger than the Suzuki Vitara, measuring 4,404 mm in length versus Vitara's 4,185 mm. This difference is reflected in trunk capacity, where the Compass offers 438 L compared to the Vitara’s 375 L. Both SUVs comfortably accommodate five passengers, but the added space in the Compass enhances its appeal for families and those who require additional storage.
Both the Jeep Compass and Suzuki Vitara come well-equipped with modern technology and comfort features. The Compass, known for its upscale interior design, emphasizes a more premium feel with quality materials and an intuitive infotainment system. The Suzuki Vitara, although traditionally seen as more utilitarian, has made significant strides in recent years with enhancements to its technology offerings, including a well-designed infotainment interface and various driver-assistance features.
The 2024 Jeep Compass incorporates notable innovations such as its advanced driver-assistance systems, which include adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and collision warning systems. The hybrid options also provide an eco-conscious choice for buyers looking to reduce their carbon footprint.
Similarly, the Suzuki Vitara boasts several innovative features, including all-wheel-drive technology, which can adapt to various terrains and weather conditions. Furthermore, it includes smartphone integration and multiple safety features to cater to tech-savvy consumers.
Ultimately, the choice between the Jeep Compass and Suzuki Vitara boils down to personal preference and specific needs. The Compass excels in power, space, and high-end features, making it suitable for families and adventure-seekers. Conversely, the Vitara stands out for its practicality, better fuel economy, and affordability, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
Regardless of which model you choose, both the Compass and Vitara offer compelling packages in the ever-evolving compact SUV segment, ensuring there’s something for everyone.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Suzuki Vitara is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,629 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Suzuki Vitara is a bit more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Compass. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers a bit more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 74 km more than the Suzuki Vitara.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers moderately more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Jeep Compass is barely faster – reaching 188 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers slightly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is noticeably lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 412 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers visibly more boot space – 550 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 175 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Jeep Compass offers clearly more capacity – up to 1,561 L, about 441 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
The Jeep Compass stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4,552 mm
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
1,675 mm
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,120 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España