Compare performance (240 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (26,700 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Renegade or Mazda CX-30?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The SUV market continues to grow, attracting drivers with its promise of versatility, style, and performance. Today, we delve into a compelling comparison between two popular models in the compact SUV segment: the Jeep Renegade and the Mazda CX-30. Both vehicles are designed to meet diverse driving needs but bring their unique strengths to the road.
Under the hood, the Jeep Renegade offers a choice between a Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) and a Plug-in Hybrid, delivering between 130 HP and 240 HP. Its power is channeled through either a dual-clutch automatic or an automatic gearbox, with front-wheel or all-wheel drive options. This flexibility offers a broad appeal depending on driving preferences. Acceleration is robust with a 0-100 km/h time between 9.7 and 7.1 seconds, showcasing its capability to handle a variety of terrains with confidence.
The Mazda CX-30, on the other hand, comes with a similarly innovative MHEV system. It offers power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP. Transmission options include both manual and automatic gearboxes, catering to a more hands-on driving experience for enthusiasts. The CX-30 matches the Renegade's torque at 240 Nm and records an acceleration time of 8.3 to 10.3 seconds. The Mazda also provides both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, ensuring steady delivery and engaging handling.
Fuel consumption for the Jeep Renegade ranges from a moderate 5.5 L/100km in its MHEV form to an impressive 2.1 L/100km in the plug-in hybrid variant, which also offers a 36 km electric-only range. This efficiency is complemented by its CO2 emissions, falling within the D and B efficiency classes.
The Mazda CX-30, while purely a petrol-driven vehicle, achieves a fuel consumption range between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km. It maintains similar CO2 efficiency classifications at D and E, highlighting its commitment to reduced emissions without compromising the driving pleasure.
The Jeep Renegade measures 4236 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and a height up to 1718 mm, providing a rugged and imposing road presence. It features a trunk capacity between 330 and 351 liters, ensuring ample cargo space for adventurous outings. Its interior is designed for comfort with five seats and practicality in mind.
In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 is slightly more extended at 4395 mm in length and 1795 mm in width with a lower height of 1540 mm. This sleek design contributes to excellent aerodynamics and a sophisticated look. The trunk offers between 422 and 430 liters of space, proving slightly more accommodating for families and long journeys. Additionally, its interior incorporates advanced design elements that promote comfort and user engagement.
Choosing between the Jeep Renegade and the Mazda CX-30 is no simple feat, as both vehicles bring distinct benefits to the table. The Renegade stands out for its hybrid options and off-road prowess, making it ideal for those seeking versatility and eco-friendliness. The CX-30 excels with its sleek design, engaging driving dynamics, and solid build, appealing to those who value style and efficiency.
Ultimately, the decision lies in what the driver values more—whether it's the adventure-ready flexibility of the Renegade or the refined performance of the CX-30, both SUVs are commendable choices in the compact SUV market.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-30 is marginally cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Jeep Renegade costs 26,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,423 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Renegade uses 2.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Renegade offers clearly more power – delivering 240 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Renegade is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 240 Nm.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Renegade is barely lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers somewhat more boot space – 430 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.
When it comes to payload, the Jeep Renegade carries somewhat more – 570 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 74 kg.
The Jeep Renegade holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Renegade wears its chunky, boxy looks like a badge of character, blending genuine off-road swagger with city-friendly manners so it feels at home on a muddy trail or a tight urban lane. Inside you'll find a surprisingly practical cabin with rugged touches and clever storage, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want a compact SUV with personality rather than just another anonymous crossover.
details
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,700 - 39,200 £
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.1 - 5.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
36 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
48 - 125 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,770 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
330 - 351 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
4,236 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
1,684 - 1,718 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,277 - 1,297 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
545 - 570 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 240 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
191 - 199 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
96 - 177 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,469 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España