VS

Jeep Wrangler vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (60,800 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Wrangler or Mazda CX-80?

Jeep Wrangler vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Jeep Wrangler

  • marginally lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Wrangler

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Jeep Wrangler costs 60,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,443 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Jeep Wrangler with 11.1 L/100km. The difference is about 7.1 L/100km.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers moderately more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Jeep Wrangler takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers markedly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Wrangler

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Wrangler is marginally lighter – 1,938 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 193 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jeep Wrangler offers considerably more boot space – 533 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 275 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries moderately more – 650 kg compared to 556 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Jeep Wrangler
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Wrangler

The Jeep Wrangler wears its go-anywhere attitude on its boxy shoulders, with exposed hinges, a removable top and a look that practically dares the tarmac to get in its way. Inside it’s simple and tough-minded, ready to swallow muddy boots and weekend gear, so if you crave honest off-road thrills rather than refined suburbia polish, the Wrangler is your unapologetic partner in adventure.

details
hp_jp021_019wr-5f50e35976ec0_60af732e25b4d
jp021_015wr-5f50e325a2f5d_60af732e2d68d
jeepwrangler4xefirstedition_lateral-600aba056478e_60af732e20e9c
jp021_011wr-5f50e3489b286_60af732e27d1b
_afp5092-60ae560437c95_60af732e02a1c

Reviews Jeep Wrangler

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Ford Ranger
Jeep Wrangler
VS
In the rugged realm of off-road legends, the Ford Ranger and the Jeep Wrangler stand as formidable contenders, each boasting unique strengths. The Ford Ranger is celebrated for its remarkable towing capacity and efficient powertrain, making it a practical choice for those who need versatility both …
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 present compelling options for those seeking a versatile SUV. The CR-V stands out with its robust reliability and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 offers a sportier driving experience with …
Jeep Wrangler
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
60,800 - 62,500 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
11.1 - 11.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
250 - 269 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,938 - 2,028 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
533 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,894 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
546 - 556 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
400 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
200 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Wrangler have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.