Compare performance (140 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (23,500 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Ceed or MG ZS?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive landscape is increasingly competitive, with manufacturers racing to incorporate cutting-edge technology and innovative designs. The Kia Ceed and the MG ZS symbolize this evolution, each offering unique attributes in their respective classes. This comparison examines the technical prowess and innovations that these models bring to the table.
The Kia Ceed, a hatchback, offers diverse engine choices, including petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) options and conventional petrol engines. With power output ranging from 100 to 140 HP (74 to 103 kW), drivers can expect a dynamic driving experience. The Ceed's acceleration varies from 9.5 to 13.2 seconds for 0-100 km/h, a testament to its versatility.
On the other hand, the MG ZS positions itself as an SUV, providing options that range from electric to hybrid and traditional petrol engines. Its power spectrum extends from 116 to 197 HP (85 to 145 kW). The ZS's electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 440 km, offering a sustainable choice for eco-conscious consumers. In terms of acceleration, the ZS can go from 0-100 km/h between 8.6 to 8.7 seconds, making it agile for an SUV.
The Kia Ceed's fuel consumption ranges from 6 to 6.4 L/100km, reflecting its efficiency. However, it carries a CO2 efficiency class of E, with emissions between 137 to 146 g/km, suggesting opportunities for improvement in environmental impact.
Meanwhile, the MG ZS excels in fuel efficiency, particularly with its hybrid options consuming as little as 5 L/100km and electric variants consuming between 17.3 to 17.8 kWh/100km. The MG ZS offers a CO2 efficiency class ranging from A to C, with emissions varying widely, showing its adaptability to greener technology.
Both vehicles accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Kia Ceed offers a trunk capacity of 357 to 395 liters, while the MG ZS leads with a more generous 443 to 448 liters. These dimensions enable both cars to cater to families and individuals with active lifestyles, providing ample cargo space.
The Kia Ceed measures between 4315 to 4325 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and a height ranging from 1442 to 1447 mm. This compact sizing is ideal for urban driving, offering maneuverability through tight spaces.
Conversely, the MG ZS, being an SUV, is slightly more substantial, measuring from 4323 to 4430 mm in length, 1809 to 1818 mm in width, and a height ranging from 1635 to 1649 mm. The broader stance and taller framework provide a commanding presence on the road, suitable for those who prefer a more elevated driving experience.
In essence, choosing between the Kia Ceed and the MG ZS depends on individual preferences and priorities. The Kia Ceed may appeal to those seeking a versatile, fuel-efficient compact car with engaging performance. Meanwhile, the MG ZS caters to drivers who need a family-friendly SUV with innovative hybrid and electric technology.
Both models reflect their manufacturers' commitment to producing vehicles that meet varied consumer needs, offering a blend of performance, efficiency, and practicality. Whether it's the urban agility of the Ceed or the robust versatility of the ZS, each car stands as a worthy contender in today's automotive market.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG ZS is visibly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Kia Ceed costs 23,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,486 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Kia Ceed with 6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers clearly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Kia Ceed takes 9.5 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia Ceed delivers significantly more torque with 253 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Ceed is only slightly lighter – 1,298 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 32 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Kia Ceed carries only slightly more – 490 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
The MG ZS holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Ceed is a sensible, stylish hatchback that gives buyers more than they'd expect for the money, blending practical space with crisp, modern looks. It drives with measured confidence and comes loaded with user-friendly kit, so you can enjoy daily life behind the wheel without breaking into a sweat.
details
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,500 - 26,300 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6 - 6.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
137 - 146 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,298 - 1,372 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
478 - 490 kg
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 140 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 13.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
172 - 253 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 103 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,482 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España