VS

Kia K4 vs Jeep Avenger comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia K4 or Jeep Avenger?

Kia K4 vs Jeep Avenger: Key differences

Kia K4

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Jeep Avenger

4.2 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

K4

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Jeep Avenger is very slightly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Kia K4 costs 24,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,220 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Kia K4 with 5.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Avenger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia K4 offers slightly more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 24 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia K4 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia K4 delivers barely more torque with 265 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is somewhat lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,415 kg. The difference is around 235 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Kia K4 offers markedly more boot space – 604 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 224 L.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries very slightly more – 502 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Avenger is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,500
Avenger

Jeep Avenger

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 100 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 400 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Kia K4
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia K4

Kia K4 shakes up the compact-sedan crowd with concept-car looks, a smartly packaged cabin, and the kind of easygoing refinement that makes rush hour feel less like a chore. It blends value, tech, and a dash of attitude, serving up a smooth, confident drive that might have you taking the long way home just to show off those angles.

details
serpimg_SfmUuV

Reviews Kia K4

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:45

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but with a sluggish gearbox and poor noise insulation.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:45

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but with a sluggish gearbox and poor soundproofing.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:44

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but with a sluggish gearbox and poor noise insulation.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:44

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but with a sluggish gearbox and poor sound insulation.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:44

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but hampered by a sluggish gearbox and poor soundproofing.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.2 (10 Reviews)
rate
Kurt
2 Jul 2026, 03:11:44

Ideal size — used only as a 2-seater.
Price acceptable —
Parking and handling — senior-friendly — controls also without touchscreen — buttons and knobs

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Jeep Avenger
VS
Comparing the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Jeep Avenger pits a classic, driver-focused Italian coupe against a contemporary, city-sized crossover built for everyday practicality. If you value vintage charisma and engaging steering, the Junior is instantly appealing; if you prefer modern safety, …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Jeep Avenger
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Suzuki Vitara are two compact SUVs that take different routes to the same goal: city-friendly size with some crossover capability — the Avenger emphasizes modern design and electrified options, while the Vitara leans on proven practicality and value. This short comparison …
Jeep Avenger
Renault Captur
VS
Short, practical comparison of the Jeep Avenger and the Renault Captur to help you pick the right small crossover for daily driving. The Avenger is Jeep’s compact, electric-minded SUV with rugged styling and straightforward EV simplicity, while the Captur is a versatile, well-rounded urban …
Jeep Avenger
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The all‑electric Jeep Avenger packs Jeep’s chunky styling into a city‑friendly crossover with brisk EV torque and cheeky off‑road looks — perfect for buyers who want electric motoring with attitude, even if it’s more boulevard than boulder. The Toyota Yaris Cross, meanwhile, swaps glamour for …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Frontera
VS
The Jeep Avenger is a cheeky, compact crossover that dresses up like an off-roader but thrives in the city — zippy, efficient and ideal if you want Jeep styling without the gas-guzzling bravado. The Opel Frontera, by contrast, is a more grown-up SUV: roomier, practical and better suited to family …
Jeep Avenger
Renault R4
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Renault 4 make for an intriguing matchup: one is a compact, tech-rich electric SUV aimed at urban adventurers, the other a revived classic that trades flash for charm, simplicity and everyday practicality. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — modern performance, …
Kia K4
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 34,200 £
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.8 - 7.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
400 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
132 - 161 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback, Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,415 - 1,540 kg
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Trunk capacity
328 - 604 L
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,850 mm
Width
1,776 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
435 - 455 kg
Payload
490 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Kia
Brand
Jeep
Is the Kia K4 offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia K4 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.