Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Kia Niro vs MG HS/EHS - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (180 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 24000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or MG HS/EHS?
Niro
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG HS/EHS has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5143 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS/EHS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Kia Niro with 2.40 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the MG HS/EHS performs evident better – achieving up to 100 km, about 38 km more than the Kia Niro.
HS/EHS
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MG HS/EHS has a noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 92 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS/EHS is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 3.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MG HS/EHS performs slight better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Kia Niro tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MG HS/EHS pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 350 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.
Niro
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Niro is somewhat lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1625 kg. The difference is around 151 kg.
In terms of boot space, the MG HS/EHS offers a bit more room – 507 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 56 L.
In maximum load capacity, the MG HS/EHS performs slight better – up to 1484 L, which is about 39 L more than the Kia Niro.
When it comes to payload, Kia Niro to a small extent takes the win – 466 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MG HS/EHS holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia Niro
MG HS/EHS
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,000
MG HS/EHS
Kia Niro
5 (1 Reviews)
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
MG HS/EHS
5 (1 Reviews)
The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.
details
Kia Niro
MG HS/EHS
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 38600 £
|
Price
24000 - 36000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 7.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
|
Electric Range
100 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
53 - 111 g/km
|
co2
14 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
|
Curb weight
1625 - 1930 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
|
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
|
|
Length
4420 mm
|
Length
4655 - 4670 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1890 mm
|
|
Height
1545 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1664 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1484 L
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 195 km/h
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
275 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1496 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, D
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
MG
|
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?
The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.