Compare performance (138 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or MG MG3?
The showdown between the 2024 Kia Niro and the 2024/2025 MG3 presents a fascinating juxtaposition of two distinct automotive philosophies. As we dig into the technical aspects and innovations of these models, each car holds its own charm for the urban explorer.
Starting with dimensions, the Kia Niro confidently presents itself as an SUV. It measures 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1545 mm in height. This presence translates into a spacious interior, accommodating five passengers comfortably with ample legroom and headroom.
On the flip side, the MG3's dimensions of 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1502 mm in height characterize it as a rather compact hatchback. While smaller in stature, it remains agile and adept for navigating tight city streets, perfect for urban commuters.
The Kia Niro is available in two variations: Full Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid, using a 1580 cm3 engine. Its hybrid technology delivers power options of 129 HP and 171 HP, or 95 kW and 126 kW, coupled with a torque of 265 Nm. The Niro’s acceleration from 0-100 km/h spans from 10.4 to 11.3 seconds, with a top speed just breaking the 160 km/h mark. Notably, its consumption efficiency ranges from 4.4 L/100km to a remarkable 0.8 L/100km, emphasizing its capacity for eco-friendly travels with CO2 emissions as low as 19 g/km.
The MG3 offers a straightforward yet punchy performance with engine capacities peaking at 1490 cm3. The power output for the 2024/2025 model reaches 116 HP or 85 kW, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 8 seconds with a top speed of 170 km/h. However, its conventional petrol engine demands slightly more fuel, averaging a consumption of 6.1 L/100km with CO2 emissions of 137 g/km.
Both vehicles share a front-wheel drive configuration, which enhances urban handling and stability. The Kia Niro features a Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission system, streamlining the driving experience toward comfort and efficiency.
The MG3, however, presents more flexibility with an available Automatic Gearbox or Manual Gearbox, catering to those who value personalized control over their driving dynamics.
The Kia Niro leans heavily on hybrid innovation, offering exceptional electric ranges of up to 65 km and a sizable battery capacity of 11.1 kWh in its Plug-in Hybrid iteration, underscoring its commitment to sustainability. Its curb weight ranges from 1474 kg to 1594 kg, accompanied by a distinctive trunk capacity of 451 to 348 liters, ensuring practicality.
Conversely, the MG3 relishes in simplicity, using a conventional petrol engine. Despite having a lesser trunk capacity of 293 liters, it doesn’t skimp on agility and excitement for drivers who delight in petrol-powered journeys.
The Kia Niro and MG3 represent two ends of the automotive spectrum with their unique blend of efficiency, performance, and style. For eco-conscious drivers passionate about hybrid advancements, the Niro's innovative technology and low emissions provide an impactful choice. In contrast, the MG3 stands out for traditional enthusiasts, delivering energetic performance and nimble handling, making daily commutes engaging and effortless.
Ultimately, the decision between the Kia Niro and MG3 boils down to personal preferences in driving ethos and lifestyle needs, each leaving its mark in the hybrid and hatchback arenas respectively.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG MG3 is considerably cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG MG3 uses 4.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Kia Niro with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers visibly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia Niro delivers substantially more torque with 265 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 117 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is moderately lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 237 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries only slightly more – 466 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 18 kg.
The MG MG3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España