Compare performance (138 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Suzuki Vitara?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive market is always abuzz with exciting new models that push the boundaries of technology and design. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of two notable contenders in the compact SUV segment: the Kia Niro and the Suzuki Vitara. Both vehicles come loaded with innovations, excellent features, and distinct specifications that cater to various consumer needs.
Starting with the Kia Niro, this versatile SUV is offered with two engine types: Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid. The Niro's power figures stand at 129 HP for the full hybrid and an impressive 171 HP for the plugin variant, delivering optimal performance combined with impressive fuel efficiency. The vehicle boasts a fuel consumption rate of just 4.4 L/100km and features a CO2 emission rating that ranges between 19 to 100 g/km, making it one of the more eco-friendly options in the market.
On the other side, the Suzuki Vitara brings a mix of petrol MHEV and Full Hybrid engines to the table. With the power output reaching up to 129 HP, it competes closely with the Niro. The Vitara's fuel consumption ranges from 5.0 to 5.6 L/100km, which is slightly higher than that of the Niro. However, its CO2 efficiency class rates are slightly lower, spanning between 113 to 129 g/km, positioning it in a different eco-friendly category.
The Kia Niro primarily employs an automatic dual-clutch transmission, which enhances its driving experience with smooth gear changes. With front-wheel drive as its standard configuration, the Niro emphasizes ease of handling and efficiency.
Conversely, the Suzuki Vitara offers greater versatility. It provides both manual and automated manual transmission options, and importantly, it gives consumers the choice of front-wheel or all-wheel drive systems. This flexibility allows the Vitara to appeal to a broader audience, especially those who may require enhanced traction for diverse driving conditions.
In terms of size, the Kia Niro measures 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1545 mm in height, providing it with a spacious interior and a trunk capacity of 451 liters. This makes it a practical option for families or anyone needing extra cargo space.
The Suzuki Vitara is slightly smaller, coming in at 4185 mm long, 1775 mm wide, and 1595 mm high. While it has a commendable trunk capacity of up to 375 liters, it doesn't quite match the Niro's offerings. However, its compact measurements may benefit those who prefer a more maneuverable vehicle in urban settings.
When it comes to tech, the Kia Niro is known for its state-of-the-art infotainment system along with advanced safety features like lane keeping assist and adaptive cruise control. Further enhancements include options for smartphone integration and numerous driver-assist technologies that elevate its status as a modern SUV.
The Suzuki Vitara also offers a suite of technological features, including a user-friendly infotainment interface, smartphone connectivity, and a range of safety systems. However, it may not be as comprehensive as those found in the Niro but still provides sufficient options for tech-savvy consumers.
Both the Kia Niro and Suzuki Vitara boast their distinct advantages, making them solid contenders in the compact SUV segment. The Kia Niro excels in eco-friendliness, cargo space, and advanced technology, while the Suzuki Vitara offers versatility in drivetrain options and a slightly more dynamic driving experience.
Your choice ultimately boils down to your personal preferences and requirements. If you prioritize sustainability and modern amenities, the Kia Niro may be the best fit for you. Alternatively, if you seek an adaptable and slightly sportier SUV, the Suzuki Vitara is worth considering. Regardless of your choice, both vehicles are designed to meet the evolving demands of today’s drivers.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Suzuki Vitara is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,563 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia Niro uses 4.5 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers slightly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 42 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is a bit lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 219 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries marginally more – 466 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España