In the ever-growing compact SUV market, the Kia Niro and Suzuki Vitara stand out with their distinct offerings. The Niro impresses with its hybrid efficiency and spacious interior, making it a practical choice for eco-conscious buyers. In contrast, the Suzuki Vitara delivers a more rugged appeal, showcasing off-road capability and a robust design, catering to adventure seekers.
The automotive market is always abuzz with exciting new models that push the boundaries of technology and design. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of two notable contenders in the compact SUV segment: the Kia Niro and the Suzuki Vitara. Both vehicles come loaded with innovations, excellent features, and distinct specifications that cater to various consumer needs.
Starting with the Kia Niro, this versatile SUV is offered with two engine types: Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid. The Niro's power figures stand at 129 HP for the full hybrid and an impressive 171 HP for the plugin variant, delivering optimal performance combined with impressive fuel efficiency. The vehicle boasts a fuel consumption rate of just 4.4 L/100km and features a CO2 emission rating that ranges between 19 to 100 g/km, making it one of the more eco-friendly options in the market.
On the other side, the Suzuki Vitara brings a mix of petrol MHEV and Full Hybrid engines to the table. With the power output reaching up to 129 HP, it competes closely with the Niro. The Vitara's fuel consumption ranges from 5.0 to 5.6 L/100km, which is slightly higher than that of the Niro. However, its CO2 efficiency class rates are slightly lower, spanning between 113 to 129 g/km, positioning it in a different eco-friendly category.
The Kia Niro primarily employs an automatic dual-clutch transmission, which enhances its driving experience with smooth gear changes. With front-wheel drive as its standard configuration, the Niro emphasizes ease of handling and efficiency.
Conversely, the Suzuki Vitara offers greater versatility. It provides both manual and automated manual transmission options, and importantly, it gives consumers the choice of front-wheel or all-wheel drive systems. This flexibility allows the Vitara to appeal to a broader audience, especially those who may require enhanced traction for diverse driving conditions.
In terms of size, the Kia Niro measures 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and 1545 mm in height, providing it with a spacious interior and a trunk capacity of 451 liters. This makes it a practical option for families or anyone needing extra cargo space.
The Suzuki Vitara is slightly smaller, coming in at 4185 mm long, 1775 mm wide, and 1595 mm high. While it has a commendable trunk capacity of up to 375 liters, it doesn't quite match the Niro's offerings. However, its compact measurements may benefit those who prefer a more maneuverable vehicle in urban settings.
When it comes to tech, the Kia Niro is known for its state-of-the-art infotainment system along with advanced safety features like lane keeping assist and adaptive cruise control. Further enhancements include options for smartphone integration and numerous driver-assist technologies that elevate its status as a modern SUV.
The Suzuki Vitara also offers a suite of technological features, including a user-friendly infotainment interface, smartphone connectivity, and a range of safety systems. However, it may not be as comprehensive as those found in the Niro but still provides sufficient options for tech-savvy consumers.
Both the Kia Niro and Suzuki Vitara boast their distinct advantages, making them solid contenders in the compact SUV segment. The Kia Niro excels in eco-friendliness, cargo space, and advanced technology, while the Suzuki Vitara offers versatility in drivetrain options and a slightly more dynamic driving experience.
Your choice ultimately boils down to your personal preferences and requirements. If you prioritize sustainability and modern amenities, the Kia Niro may be the best fit for you. Alternatively, if you seek an adaptable and slightly sportier SUV, the Suzuki Vitara is worth considering. Regardless of your choice, both vehicles are designed to meet the evolving demands of today’s drivers.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 28100 - 37800
£
|
Price
about 23200 - 30400
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 4.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
59 - 65
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
19 - 100
g/km
|
co2
113 - 129
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594
kg
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1395
kg
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451
L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375
L
|
Length
4420
mm
|
Length
4185
mm
|
Width
1825
mm
|
Width
1775
mm
|
Height
1545
mm
|
Height
1595
mm
|
Payload
466
kg
|
Payload
375 - 395
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
129 - 171
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 129
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.4 - 11.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 161
km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190
km/h
|
Torque
265
Nm
|
Torque
235
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
95 - 126
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 95
kW
|
Engine capacity
1580
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462
cm3
|
Top speed
160 - 161
km/h
|
Top speed
180 - 190
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.