Compare performance (116 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 34,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or Nissan Interstar?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda 2 Hybrid is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 34,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,515 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 2 Hybrid uses 3.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar offers noticeably more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 Hybrid is considerably lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 873 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries substantially more – 1,447 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,012 kg.
The Nissan Interstar holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.
detailsThe Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 28,200 £
|
Price
34,900 - 55,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 7.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
175 - 410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
87 - 93 g/km
|
co2
0 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,535 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
286 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,685 - 6,315 mm
|
|
Width
1,745 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
2,498 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
10,800 - 13,000 L
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
965 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
115 - 177 km/h
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|