Compare performance (116 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 21,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or Renault Captur?
In the ever-evolving world of automobiles, more consumers are leaning towards vehicles that offer a blend of efficiency, style, and advanced technology. Two vibrant contenders in the market are the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Renault Captur. Here's a closer look at how these two cars stack up against each other.
Starting with the Mazda 2 Hybrid, this hatchback exudes a compact design that is perfect for urban environments. Measuring 3940 mm in length, 1745 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height, it offers a practical, yet stylish look. Complemented by a curb weight of 1180 kg, the Mazda 2 Hybrid is both light and agile.
In contrast, the Renault Captur boasts a more robust SUV body style, with a length of 4239 mm, a width of 1797 mm, and a height of 1575 mm. Its sporty appearance is further enhanced by a formidable curb weight starting at 1358 kg, offering a commanding presence on the road.
Under the hood, the Mazda 2 Hybrid is powered by a full hybrid system with a 1.5-liter engine capacity, delivering 116 HP (85 kW). It features a seamless CVT automatic transmission and front-wheel drive, ensuring refined performance with an impressive acceleration of 0-100 km/h in just 9.7 seconds.
Conversely, the Renault Captur provides versatility with various engine options, including full hybrid and petrol MHEV variants. The full hybrid version generates 143 HP (105 kW) from its 1.6-liter engine, achieving 0-100 km/h in 9.9 seconds. Drivers can choose between automatic and manual gearbox options, ensuring adaptability to different driving needs.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the Mazda 2 Hybrid shines with an impressive fuel consumption rate of 3.8-4 L/100 km and CO2 emissions ranging from 87-93 g/km, earning a B efficiency class rating. Its eco-friendly design is ideal for those conscious of their carbon footprint.
The Renault Captur offers a range of consumption rates, with the full hybrid variant achieving around 4.7 L/100 km and CO2 emissions of 106 g/km, placing it in the C efficiency class. While not as efficient as the Mazda, it provides a reasonable balance between performance and environmental considerations.
Both vehicles offer seating for five passengers, but differ in terms of trunk capacity. The Mazda 2 Hybrid features a trunk space of 286 liters—a more modest offering compared to the Renault Captur's more generous 422 liters in certain petrol variants, making the Captur an advantageous choice for families or those requiring extra storage.
Additionally, the Renault Captur's fuel tank holds 48 liters compared to Mazda's 36 liters, potentially reducing frequent refueling stops, especially on longer trips.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the Renault Captur depends on the buyer’s priorities. The Mazda 2 Hybrid is an excellent choice for those prioritizing efficiency and a compact design. Conversely, the Renault Captur offers a versatile array of engine options and a more spacious interior, appealing to those who desire additional power and cargo capacity. Both models represent modern automotive innovation, catering to diverse consumer needs in the 2024 market.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Captur is very slightly cheaper – starting at 21,100 £ , while the Mazda 2 Hybrid costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 292 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 2 Hybrid uses 3.8 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Renault Captur with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur offers visibly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Captur is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Mazda 2 Hybrid takes 9.7 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 Hybrid is slightly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 143 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers markedly more boot space – 422 L compared to 286 L. That’s a difference of about 136 L.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries marginally more – 453 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 18 kg.
The Renault Captur stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.
details
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 28,200 £
|
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
87 - 93 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 kg
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
286 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,239 mm
|
|
Width
1,745 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España