Compare performance (186 HP vs 326 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or BMW X1?
The compact SUV segment continues to thrive, with numerous models vying for supremacy. Among them, the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their innovative technologies, performance capabilities, and overall design. In this article, we’ll dissect both models, focusing on their technical aspects, features, and innovations to help you make an informed decision.
The BMW X1 boasts a diverse range of engine options with power outputs ranging from 150 to 326 HP. Customers can choose from several engine types, including Diesel, Petrol, and hybrid variants. The most capable configuration can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.4 seconds, with a top speed reaching up to 250 km/h. The incorporation of both front-wheel and all-wheel drive systems adds versatility to the driving experience.
In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 primarily offers petrol MHEV powertrains, producing between 140 to 186 HP. Despite fewer options, it delivers impressive acceleration figures, with the best variant achieving 0-100 km/h in about 8.3 seconds and a top speed of 204 km/h. Both vehicles feature automatic transmissions, enhancing the driving experience with smooth shifts.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the BMW X1 excels with figures as low as 4.6 L/100 km for some variants. The overall consumption for the lineup ranges between 5.1 and 7.7 L/100 km, depending on the specific engine and configuration chosen. These fuel-efficient models emit CO2 ratings from 120 to 175 g/km, falling into efficiency classes B to F.
Bucking the trend slightly, the Mazda CX-30 shows competitive consumption figures ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km. Its CO2 emissions range from 129 g/km to 148 g/km, placing it in CO2 efficiency classes D and E. While both vehicles are oriented towards efficiency, the BMW X1 has a clear advantage in e-mobility with its hybrid configurations.
Step into the BMW X1, and you are greeted with a premium interior that blends function with luxury. The model accommodates up to five passengers with ample space and a trunk capacity of up to 540 liters. Its focus on driver and passenger comfort is complemented by the latest in infotainment and driver assistance technologies.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 offers a stylish interior that emphasizes a driver-centric layout. While providing slightly less trunk space (430 liters), it doesn’t skimp on user-friendly technology or comfort features. Mazda’s infotainment system integrates practical functionality and modern design, ensuring an enjoyable ride.
Safety is paramount in both SEVs, and both the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-30 come rigged with an array of safety features. The BMW X1 offers advanced driver assistance technologies, such as lane-keeping assistance and adaptive cruise control, significantly enhancing safety and convenience on the road.
Similarly, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with robust safety systems including adaptive cruise control and automatic emergency braking. Its commitment to safety earned it high marks in crash tests, proving that it stands toe-to-toe with the BMW in this critical aspect.
In the battle of the BMW X1 vs. Mazda CX-30, both models have unique strengths. The BMW X1 is undoubtedly the powerhouse of the two, offering more engine choices, better performance metrics, and innovative hybrid technology. However, the Mazda CX-30 presents a compelling argument with its stylish interior, excellent safety ratings, and strong reliability reputation.
Your choice ultimately hinges on what you value more in a compact SUV: raw performance and luxury, or style and practicality. Each model has its stellar attributes, making either a worthy contender in the compact SUV market. Happy driving!
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,994 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X1 uses 2.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers considerably more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 140 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X1 delivers significantly more torque with 477 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 237 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is very slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 120 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X1 offers markedly more boot space – 540 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW X1 carries barely more – 500 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
The BMW X1 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
The BMW X1 brings a premium feel to compact crossover life, wrapping practical space and agile handling into a tidy, upscale package. It’s ideal for buyers who want BMW driving dynamics without the bulk, offering everyday comfort and a few clever tricks to keep the commute interesting.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
Price
38,200 - 55,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
81 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.2 kWh
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
57 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 - 54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,500 mm
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,630 - 1,642 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,495 - 1,545 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
190 - 233 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
BMW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España