VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Citroen C4 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 20,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Citroen C4?

Mazda CX-30 vs Citroen C4: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power

Citroen C4

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen C4 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 20,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,672 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C4 uses 4.7 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

C4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C4 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C4 delivers moderately more torque with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C4 is only slightly lighter – 1,403 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 52 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen C4 offers slightly more boot space – 510 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries moderately more – 496 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C4 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £20,600
C4

Citroen C4

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.5 - 15.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 354 - 427 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Citroen C3
Citroen C4
VS
The Citroën C3 is the cheeky city hatch that charms with low running costs, soft suspension and easy parking, while the Citroën C4 stretches into crossover territory with more space, stronger engines and sharper tech. If you mostly nip around town grab the C3 for its thrift and comfort; if you want …
Mazda CX-30
Citroen C4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Citroen C4

Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.

details
C4_2021_EXT (7)
C4_2021_EXT (13)
C4_2021_EXT (11)
CL 20
C4_INT_2021 (8)

Reviews Citroen C4

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Tomasz
25 Dec 2025, 23:25:28

A very comfortable car, but with a flaw I noticed: very high door sills, which you really feel when getting in.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Citroen C4
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Citroën C3 Aircross and Citroën C4 offer distinct advantages catering to diverse driving needs. The C3 Aircross, with its compact SUV design, provides a higher driving position and greater versatility, ideal for urban adventures or family outings. Conversely, the …
Citroen C4
DS Automobiles DS 4
VS
The Citroen C4 and DS Automobiles DS 4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Citroen C4
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Citroën C4 and Peugeot 2008 stand out for their distinctive styling and technology features. While the C4 offers a plush ride with a focus on comfort, the 2008 impresses with its sporty handling and dynamic design. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
Citroen C4
Citroen C5 Aircross
VS
The Citroën C4 and the Citroën C5 Aircross both exemplify the brand's commitment to comfort and innovative design, yet they cater to slightly different needs. The C4, with its sleek hatchback form and dynamic performance, is ideal for those seeking a compact vehicle with a city-friendly demeanor. …
Mazda CX-30
Citroen C4

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
20,600 - 32,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 108 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,659 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
Length
-
Length
4,350 - 4,580 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
Height
-
Height
1,520 - 1,525 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,250 - 1,360 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
379 - 406 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
150 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Citroen
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.