VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 1,050 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 420,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster?

Mazda CX-30 vs Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • slightly lighter

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster costs 420,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 394,766 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster with 9.3 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

849 Testarossa Roadster

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster offers considerably more power – delivering 1,050 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 864 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.3 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 6 s quicker.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,660 kg. The difference is around 205 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

The Ferrari Testarossa Roadster strips the classic wedge-shaped drama down to open-top glamour, ensuring you arrive with presence and a grin. Behind the wheel it delivers a theatrical soundtrack and analogue charisma that will reward collectors and spirited drivers alike.

details
serpimg_Wp6wLc

Reviews Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Lexus UX and the Mazda CX-30, both models stand out in the competitive compact crossover segment, yet they cater to different priorities. The Lexus UX excels with its luxurious interior and top-notch safety features, making it a desirable choice for those …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
Mazda CX-30
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
420,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
9.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
25 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
212 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,660 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,999 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
1,050 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
772 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
3,990 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ferrari
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.