VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Ferrari Amalfi comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 640 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 205,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Ferrari Amalfi?

Mazda CX-30 vs Ferrari Amalfi: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (13 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • slightly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Ferrari Amalfi

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Ferrari Amalfi costs 205,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 180,009 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ferrari Amalfi with 11.2 L/100km. The difference is about 5.5 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari Amalfi offers considerably more power – delivering 640 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 454 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari Amalfi is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.3 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari Amalfi delivers substantially more torque with 760 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 520 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,700 kg. The difference is around 245 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeably more boot space – 430 L compared to 273 L. That’s a difference of about 157 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries markedly more – 496 kg compared to 370 kg. That’s a difference of about 126 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Ferrari Amalfi

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (13 Reviews)
rate
Owners tend to be positive about the Mazda CX-30, often praising its quiet, well‑finished cabin, engaging driving feel and overall perceived value. Some owners mention strengths like refinement and build quality, while others call out drawbacks such as high cost for smaller engines, a tight fit for taller occupants, and mixed opinions on oversized wheel styling. These comments are relatively brief and somewhat mixed, so those negatives may not reflect every owner’s experience.
Jeroen
4 Sept 2026, 11:40:07

G engine based on much tried and tested predecessor

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari Amalfi

Ferrari's latest masterpiece, the Amalfi, captivates the senses with its sleek design and unparalleled performance. Aptly named after the stunning coastal region in Italy, the Amalfi embodies luxury and elegance while promising an exhilarating driving experience. It effortlessly merges classic Ferrari DNA with modern innovation, making it a true icon in the world of high-performance automobiles.

details

Reviews Ferrari Amalfi

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Mazda CX-30
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda MX-30
VS
In the rapidly evolving world of crossover SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda MX-30 represent distinct approaches to modern driving needs, each with its unique charm. The CX-30 captivates with its robust yet refined design supported by a traditional internal combustion engine, focusing on …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-60
VS
In a spirited face-off between the dynamic Mazda CX-30 and the imposing Mazda CX-60, each model showcases Mazda's distinct commitment to design and performance. The CX-30, with its compact stature and nimble handling, delivers an agile driving experience ideal for urban environments. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Ferrari Amalfi

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
205,700 - 231,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
11.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
254 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe, Convertible
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,700 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
273 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,974 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
370 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
640 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
760 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
471 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
3,855 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ferrari
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.