VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Ferrari Purosangue - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 725 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 324700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Ferrari Purosangue?

CX-30

Introducing the Rivals: Mazda CX-30 vs. Ferrari Purosangue

The automotive landscape is evolving rapidly, showcasing a diverse array of vehicles that cater to varied consumer needs and desires. In this comparison, we delve into two iconic models from distinct realms of the automotive spectrum: the practical and stylish Mazda CX-30 and the ultra-luxurious Ferrari Purosangue. Despite their differing intentions—one a pragmatic, versatile SUV and the other a high-performance super SUV—both models bring unique appeal and advanced technology to the table.

CX-30

Design and Dimensions

Starting with their dimensions, the Mazda CX-30 is a compact yet spacious SUV, measuring 4,395 mm in length, 1,795 mm in width, and 1,540 mm in height. It features a contemporary design language with a sporty stance, designed to attract those seeking both form and function.

In stark contrast, the Ferrari Purosangue is a bold statement of Italian artistry and engineering, measuring a substantial 4,973 mm in length, 2,028 mm in width, and 1,589 mm in height. Its aggressive lines, dynamic profile, and unmistakable Ferrari design elements draw immediate attention, positioning it as a vehicle for those who desire performance alongside exclusivity.

CX-30

Powertrains and Performance

The Mazda CX-30 offers a range of engine options, including a petrol MHEV producing up to 186 HP from a 2.0L engine. With torque figures peaking at 240 Nm, it provides a respectable performance for an SUV, achieving 0-100 km/h in 8.3 seconds and a top speed of 204 km/h. Plus, its efficient fuel consumption of approximately 5.8 L/100 km highlights its practical aspect for everyday use.

On the other end of the spectrum, the Ferrari Purosangue boasts a formidable 6.5L V12 engine producing a staggering 830 HP and 692 Nm of torque. Accelerating from 0-100 km/h in an astonishing 3.3 seconds and reaching a top speed of 312 km/h, this superSUV redefines performance expectations in the luxury segment. However, this power comes at a cost, with fuel consumption peaking at around 17.1 L/100 km and CO2 emissions rated at 389 g/km.

CX-30

Technology and Innovation

When it comes to technology, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped with an intuitive infotainment system, encompassing the Mazda Connect platform, which integrates smartphone connectivity and a premium sound system. It emphasizes safety with advanced driver assistance systems, ensuring that every journey is connected and secure.

Conversely, the Ferrari Purosangue is laden with cutting-edge automotive technology, featuring a sophisticated dual-clutch automatic transmission for rapid shifts and optimized power delivery. Its advanced aerodynamics and performance-focused innovations, such as an advanced all-wheel-drive system, guarantee exhilarating handling on all terrains. The interior is tailored with luxury materials and state-of-the-art digital displays, seamlessly merging technology and opulence.

Interior Space and Comfort

Within the Mazda CX-30, comfort and practicality are paramount. With seating for five, it provides ample passenger space and a trunk capacity of up to 430 liters, making it a fantastic option for families or adventurous outings.

In contrast, the Purosangue, designed to accommodate four occupants, prioritizes luxury over functional space, offering bespoke options and premium finishes throughout its cabin. The trunk, while slightly larger at 473 liters, reflects the model's focus on performance and prestige rather than everyday utility.

Conclusion: A Tale of Two SUVs

In conclusion, the Mazda CX-30 and Ferrari Purosangue serve distinctly different segments of the SUV market. The CX-30 shines as a reliable and stylish option for daily drivers seeking practicality, comfort, and moderate performance. Meanwhile, the Purosangue stands as a magnificent testament to automotive engineering, pushing the boundaries of performance and luxury in a way only Ferrari can.

The choice between these two vehicles ultimately reflects the buyer's priorities—whether it's the coherent blend of functionality and style represented by the CX-30, or the exhilarating, high-octane experience delivered by the Purosangue. Each car brings its own unique story to the SUV landscape, ensuring that enthusiasts and everyday drivers alike have something to admire.

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Ferrari Purosangue

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Ferrari Purosangue costs 324700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 299514 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-30 manages with 5.70 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Ferrari Purosangue with 17.10 L. The difference is about 11.40 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari Purosangue has a convincingly edge – offering 725 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 539 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari Purosangue is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.30 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 5 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ferrari Purosangue pulls clearly stronger with 692 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 452 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers slightly more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is distinct lighter – 1455 kg compared to 2033 kg. The difference is around 578 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ferrari Purosangue offers slight more room – 473 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-30
Ferrari Purosangue

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Ferrari Purosangue

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Ferrari Purosangue flips the script on what a Ferrari can be, marrying the brand's savage performance and intoxicating exhaust note with the space and practicality of a usable grand tourer. For buyers who crave supercar drama without sacrificing everyday comfort, the Purosangue offers theatrical driving thrills and enough presence to stop traffic at the valet.

details

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Ferrari Purosangue

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Ferrari Purosangue

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
324700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
17.10 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
389 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
100 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
2033 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
473 L
Length
-
Length
4973 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
2028 mm
Height
-
Height
1589 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
725 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.30 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
312 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
692 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
533 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
6496 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ferrari

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Honda Civic
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Honda Civic and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
Renault Symbioz
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Symbioz present two compelling yet distinct choices for crossover enthusiasts. The CX-30 shines with its refined interior, agile handling, and a traditional gasoline powertrain that appeals to purists. Meanwhile, the Renault Symbioz, as an …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
In a competitive showdown between the Mazda CX-30 and the VW Golf, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths and characteristics. The CX-30 impresses with its sleek design and upscale interior, appealing to those seeking a blend of style and practicality, while the Golf offers a well-rounded …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.