VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Genesis GV60 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 490 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 46,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Genesis GV60?

Mazda CX-30 vs Genesis GV60: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (13 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

Genesis GV60

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Genesis GV60 costs 46,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,163 £.

GV60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Genesis GV60 offers considerably more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 304 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Genesis GV60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Genesis GV60 delivers substantially more torque with 700 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 460 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is significantly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,050 kg. The difference is around 595 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries very slightly more – 496 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 36 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Genesis GV60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £46,900
GV60

Genesis GV60

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 229 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 501 - 561 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Genesis GV60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (13 Reviews)
rate
Owners tend to be positive about the Mazda CX-30, often praising its quiet, well‑finished cabin, engaging driving feel and overall perceived value. Some owners mention strengths like refinement and build quality, while others call out drawbacks such as high cost for smaller engines, a tight fit for taller occupants, and mixed opinions on oversized wheel styling. These comments are relatively brief and somewhat mixed, so those negatives may not reflect every owner’s experience.
Jeroen
4 Sept 2026, 11:40:07

G engine based on much tried and tested predecessor

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Genesis GV60

The Genesis GV60 arrives like a fashionably sharp electric crossover, its jewel-like lighting and coupe-ish silhouette giving it presence that feels more boutique than showroom. It pairs playful, immediate acceleration with a serene, well-appointed cabin and slick tech, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want luxury with a cheeky electric twist.

details
615367
615369
615332
615320

Reviews Genesis GV60

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
MorZan
14 Sept 2026, 09:33:40

I've been driving the Genesis GV60 Sport for 3 years, and my next car will again be the same model — the facelift version.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda MX-30
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Mazda MX-30 are compact SUVs with distinctive styling, refined driving manners, and a strong focus on quality. While the CX-30 offers greater practicality and a broader range of powertrains, the MX-30 stands out with its unique design and electrified character.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Corolla
VS
In the crossover-SUV realm, the Mazda CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and agile handling, making it a strong contender for those seeking an engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Toyota Corolla, a staple in the compact car segment, offers remarkable reliability and efficiency, …
CUPRA Formentor
Mazda CX-30
VS
CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage stands out with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology features, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 captivates drivers with its sporty handling and upscale interior, …
Mazda CX-30
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
Genesis GV60

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
46,900 - 63,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
501 - 561 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
2,050 - 2,220 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
455 - 460 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
229 - 490 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 7.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
350 - 700 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
168 - 360 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Genesis
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.