@ Kia Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Kia Sportage vs Mazda CX-30 – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Sportage or Mazda CX-30?

Sportage @ Kia Corporation

The automotive landscape continues to evolve rapidly, with manufacturers striving to strike the perfect balance between performance, technology, and practicality. In this comparison, we look at two popular entries in the compact SUV segment: the Kia Sportage and the Mazda CX-30. Both vehicles have carved a niche for themselves with their unique offerings and innovations, making them strong contenders in the market. Let’s dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these vehicles apart.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine Options and Performance

The 2024 Kia Sportage comes with a diverse lineup of engine options catering to various driver needs. It offers a range of alternatives including Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Petrol, and Plugin Hybrid, giving it an edge in versatility. The power output ranges from 136 HP to a powerful 252 HP, with diesel options providing robust torque figures as high as 350 Nm. The Sportage showcases a quick acceleration from 0-100 km/h, clocking in as low as 8.3 seconds with its most potent engine.

On the other hand, the 2024 Mazda CX-30 is powered primarily by a Petrol MHEV which produces up to 186 HP. This positions the CX-30 as a capable vehicle, but with less engine variety compared to the Sportage. Its acceleration is commendable as well, reaching 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, but the maximum torque peaks at 240 Nm, which is lower than the Sportage’s highest output.

Sportage @ Kia Corporation

Fuel Efficiency

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Kia Sportage stands out with consumption figures ranging between 5.0 to 7.2 L/100 km depending on the trim and engine choice. The availability of mild-hybrid and hybrid technologies contributes significantly to its impressive efficiency. Its Plugin Hybrid variant also boasts an electric range of up to 64 km, enhancing the appeal for environmentally conscious drivers.

The Mazda CX-30, while not as diverse in its engine offerings, is quite efficient in its own right. Fuel consumption figures vary from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, making it a solid choice for daily driving. However, the absence of hybrid variants may deter buyers looking for an eco-friendly option.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Interior Space and Comfort

Space is a critical factor when evaluating SUVs, and both Kia and Mazda have imbued their models with functionality. The Kia Sportage boasts a generous trunk capacity ranging from 526 to 587 liters, which is excellent for families or those carrying larger items. The cabin of the Sportage is designed with comfort in mind, offering ample legroom and a high-quality interior that rivals more premium brands.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 offers a slightly smaller trunk capacity at 430 to 422 liters. However, it compensates with a driver-focused cockpit that emphasizes ergonomics and premium materials. The overall ambience of the CX-30’s interior is sophisticated, making it a pleasant place to spend time in.

Sportage @ Kia Corporation

Technology and Safety Innovations

In terms of technology, both vehicles are equipped with advanced features, but the Kia Sportage leans more into innovations. The Sportage includes a highly intuitive infotainment system, large touchscreen interfaces, and a series of driver-assistance technologies, such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. Furthermore, the vehicle typically receives high ratings in safety tests, reflecting Kia’s commitment to driver and passenger security.

The Mazda CX-30, while offering a slightly less extensive tech package, does not fall short in safety features. Its innovative i-Activsense suite includes smart brake support and blind-spot monitoring, which contribute to its reputation for reliability. The CX-30’s infotainment system, albeit simpler, is functional and user-friendly, enhancing the overall driving experience.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion

Each vehicle has its strong points, making the decision largely dependent on personal priorities. The Kia Sportage shines with its extensive engine options, spacious interiors, and cutting-edge technology, making it ideal for families and tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its stylish design, engaging driving dynamics, and premium interior, appealing to those who value aesthetics and comfort.

Ultimately, potential buyers should take both models for a test drive to experience firsthand how their distinctive characteristics align with individual preferences. In this competitive compact SUV segment, both the Kia Sportage and Mazda CX-30 offer compelling reasons to be considered for anyone’s next vehicle purchase.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Sportage @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Kia Sportage costs 30200 £. That’s a price difference of around 4928 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Sportage manages with 5 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia Sportage has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 239 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia Sportage is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Kia Sportage tops out at 203 km/h. The difference is around 1 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Sportage pulls distinct stronger with 320 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is minimal lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1552 kg. The difference is around 97 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia Sportage offers clearly perceptible more room – 587 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 157 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia Sportage performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1776 L, which is about 370 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Kia Sportage a bit takes the win – 580 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Kia Sportage proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Kia Sportage is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £30,200
Sportage @ Kia Corporation

Kia Sportage

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 136 - 239 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 7.9 L
details

Kia Sportage

5 (1)
rate

The Kia Sportage proves you don't have to choose between style and sensible family motoring, wrapping modern, confident looks around a roomy, well-equipped cabin. It's an easy car to live with — comfortable on daily runs, pleasantly engaging when you want a bit of fun, and kind to your wallet so you can keep smiling at the fuel pump.

details
Kia_Sportage_M22_24 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_Sportage_M22_37 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_Sportage_M22_25 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_Sportage_M22_84 @ Kia Corporation

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
VS
The CUPRA Terramar attacks the compact-SUV class with sharp handling, brash styling and a sporty, premium edge, while the Kia Sportage plays the sensible rival—roomier, friendlier on the wallet and loaded with mainstream tech. If you want driver-focused thrills and a head-turning look pick the …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Kia Sportage flaunts a bolder design, plush cabin and tech-heavy kit that feels like buying the future — perfect if you want comfort and a bit of showmanship on your commute. The Skoda Karoq plays the sensible sibling: conservative looks, clever packaging, enjoyable handling and better value, …
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-30
Sportage @ Kia Corporation
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
30200 - 43900 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 7.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
132 - 180 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
52 - 54 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1552 - 1733 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
526 - 587 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4540 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1865 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1645 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1715 - 1776 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
543 - 580 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 239 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 11.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
180 - 203 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
250 - 320 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
100 - 176 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Kia
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Seal U
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the BYD Seal U and the Kia Sportage, both vehicles showcase impressive design and advanced technology, appealing to modern drivers. The BYD Seal U stands out with its all-electric performance and innovative features, while the Kia Sportage offers a more traditional …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG HS
VS
In the fiercely competitive crossover SUV segment, the Kia Sportage and MG HS each bring distinct appeals to the table. The Kia Sportage impresses with its sleek design, advanced technology, and efficient powertrain options, offering a blend of style and practicality. Meanwhile, the MG HS stands …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
VS
The Kia Sportage is the sensible, value-packed family SUV — comfortable, practical and a reliable all-rounder — while the Renault Austral plays the style card with a sharper interior, clever hybrid tech and more upmarket flair. Pick the Sportage for straightforward practicality and a friendlier …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Kia Sportage and Dacia Bigster present two compelling options in the SUV market, each catering to different consumer needs. The Kia Sportage impresses with its sleek design and tech-rich interior, offering a refined driving experience with advanced safety features. Meanwhile, the Dacia Bigster …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ateca
VS
When comparing the Kia Sportage and the SEAT Ateca, both models stand out for their blend of style and practicality. The Sportage boasts a more spacious interior and a comprehensive suite of tech features, appealing to families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Ateca offers agile handling …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Duster
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
VS
The Dacia Duster and Kia Sportage compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Is the Kia Sportage offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Sportage is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.