VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Lexus UX comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 199 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Lexus UX?

Mazda CX-30 vs Lexus UX: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • barely lighter

Lexus UX

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

CX-30

Lexus UX vs. Mazda CX-30: A Sophisticated Showdown in the Compact SUV Arena

The compact SUV segment has grown increasingly competitive, offering a diverse range of options for city dwellers and adventurers alike. Among the top contenders in this category are the Lexus UX and the Mazda CX-30. These models offer unique blends of style, performance, and innovation, catering to varying tastes and preferences. In this article, we delve into the features that set these two vehicles apart and highlight their technical strengths.

UX

Design and Dimensions

The Lexus UX and the Mazda CX-30 share the SUV body type but express distinct design philosophies. The Lexus UX boasts a more modern, urban styling with dimensions of 4,495 mm in length, 1,840 mm in width, and 1,545 mm in height. This design emphasizes a sleek, aerodynamic silhouette that aligns with its reputation for luxury.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 exudes Mazda's Kodo design language, which blends elegance with a sporty demeanor. At 4,395 mm in length, 1,795 mm in width, and 1,540 mm in height, the CX-30 is slightly more compact, making it easier to navigate tight city streets while maintaining a dynamic stance.

CX-30

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Lexus UX offers a choice between electric and full-hybrid engine types. The electric variant produces 204 HP with a seamless Reduction Gearbox transmission, while the hybrid option offers 199 HP with a CVT transmission. Both models are available in front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, prioritizing efficiency with consumption figures of 5-5.6 L/100 km for the hybrid and 16.7 kWh/100 km for the electric version. The electric UX achieves an impressive range of 449 km.

The Mazda CX-30, on the other hand, is powered by a petrol mild-hybrid engine with outputs ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP. It provides both manual and automatic gearbox options, appealing to traditional driving enthusiasts and those seeking a more leisurely driving experience. The CX-30 impresses with slightly higher fuel consumption rates of 5.7-6.6 L/100 km but compensates with a robust maximum speed of up to 204 km/h, perfect for highway excursions.

UX

Interior Comfort and Practicality

Inside, the Lexus UX is optimized for luxury and comfort, offering a plush cabin with seating for four. Despite its focus on high-end experiences, the UX provides practical features like a trunk capacity of 283-367 L, catering to urban escapades or minimalist adventure trips.

The Mazda CX-30 expands on passenger accommodation with seating for five, making it ideal for families. The CX-30 also offers a larger trunk capacity of 422-430 L, granting extra space for luggage and equipment, which is advantageous for longer journeys.

CX-30

Safety and Technological Innovations

Both models deploy state-of-the-art safety features, but each brand has distinct technological highlights. Lexus equips the UX with advanced driver assistance systems and connectivity features that align with their commitment to innovation and luxury.

Mazda integrates the CX-30 with intuitive systems that enhance the driving experience while ensuring safety. The integration of mild-hybrid technology in Mazda's engine further exemplifies its commitment to blending performance with ecological mindfulness.

UX

Conclusion

The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 offer exciting alternatives for compact SUV buyers. The Lexus UX appeals to those prioritizing luxury and electrified innovation, while the Mazda CX-30 captures the essence of spirited driving with a larger cabin and sporty elegance. Ultimately, the choice between these two depends on whether the buyer values a cutting-edge urban experience or the allure of a balanced, spirited drive.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
Lexus UX
VS
If you're choosing between the new Lexus LBX and the older Lexus UX, the LBX is the cheeky city-smart compact — smaller, cheaper and lighter on fuel thanks to Toyota-derived hybrid underpinnings — while the UX delivers a chunkier, more premium feel, extra interior space and stronger hybrid …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Lexus UX costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,694 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lexus UX uses 5 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

UX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Lexus UX offers barely more power – delivering 199 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lexus UX is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is barely lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,495 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Lexus UX carries moderately more – 615 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Mazda CX-30
Lexus UX

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Lexus UX

The Lexus UX is a compact luxury crossover that blends sharp styling with a quiet, comfortable cabin, perfect for urban buyers who want premium feel without shouting about it. It rides with poise, serves up plush materials and thoughtful tech, and—while it won’t satisfy anyone chasing track thrills—it's a smart, stylish choice for everyday driving.

details
78811-lexusux250h2023005
78811-lexusux250h2023006
78811-lexusux250h2023008
76370-mc23-ux-reveal-018-high-jpg

Reviews Lexus UX

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
marjollet
10 Feb 2026, 16:56:36

After a Toyota Avensis D4D with a BMW engine, I chose the UX 250h F Sport Design and I'm very satisfied.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Norma
21 Dec 2025, 18:27:57

Lv my UX I live 10 miles outside Belfast do aloy of country driving to reach different places I go t

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR stand out with their distinctive designs and hybrid options. While the Lexus UX offers a more premium interior and advanced technology features, the Toyota C-HR appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its sporty styling and …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique appeal and driving dynamics. While the HR-V offers a spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the CX-30 impresses with its upscale cabin and engaging handling. Ultimately, your choice between …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Lexus UX

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
37,900 - 54,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
113 - 127 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,495 - 1,555 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,840 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
555 - 615 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
199 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
146 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Lexus
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.