VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 843 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 97,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé?

Mazda CX-30 vs Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé

  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé costs 97,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 71,977 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé with 9.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.

AMG GT 4-Door Coupé

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé offers clearly more power – delivering 843 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 657 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 5.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé delivers considerably more torque with 1,470 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 1,230 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is clearly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 585 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé offers only slightly more boot space – 461 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé carries barely more – 510 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £97,200
AMG GT 4-Door Coupé

Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 389 - 843 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 9.5 - 12.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 11 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you …
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé

The Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupé transforms AMG's sports-car attitude into a surprisingly practical four-door package, pairing dramatic coupe looks with an interior that's both luxurious and genuinely usable. It's the choice for buyers who want supercar charisma without losing daily comfort — dramatic presence, a rorty soundtrack, and a chassis that turns routine drives into something worth smiling about.

details
22C0220_007
22C0220_008
22C0136_006
22C0135_050
22C0179_004

Reviews Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Honda Civic
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Honda Civic and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
CUPRA Formentor
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique appeal and driving dynamics. While the HR-V offers a spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the CX-30 impresses with its upscale cabin and engaging handling. Ultimately, your choice between …
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes AMG GT 4-Door Coupé

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
97,200 - 182,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
9.5 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
11 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
215 - 287 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
73 - 80 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,380 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
335 - 461 L
Length
-
Length
5,054 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,953 mm
Height
-
Height
1,447 - 1,455 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
380 - 510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
389 - 843 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
270 - 316 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
500 - 1,470 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
286 - 620 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,999 - 3,982 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.