VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mercedes GLC comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 50,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Mercedes GLC?

Mazda CX-30 vs Mercedes GLC: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

Mercedes GLC

4.4 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Mercedes GLC costs 50,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,093 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes GLC uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.1 L/100km.

GLC

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC offers significantly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 303 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC delivers substantially more torque with 800 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is markedly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,985 kg. The difference is around 530 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers markedly more boot space – 620 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 190 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLC carries slightly more – 575 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes GLC holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £50,300
GLC

Mercedes GLC

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 186 - 489 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 9.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 122 - 714 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes GLC
Volvo EX60
VS
Unsure whether the Mercedes GLC or the Volvo EX60 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes GLC

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes GLC

The Mercedes GLC blends plush cabin comfort and composed road manners into an SUV that feels more grown-up than it looks. It won’t shout for attention, but will quietly please buyers who want refinement, usable space and a touch of luxury without the drama.

details
22C0270_060
22C0270_055
22C0270_051
22C0270_046
22C0270_031

Reviews Mercedes GLC

4.4 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marek
2 Jan 2026, 18:32:30

There’s something about a Mercedes — you have to take it for a spin to feel it and understand why it’s special.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mercedes GLC
Toyota RAV4
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mercedes GLC and the Toyota RAV4, the luxurious GLC excels in offering a refined driving experience and premium interior materials that define its upscale appeal. Meanwhile, the RAV4 impresses with its practicality, reliability, and advanced safety features, …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q6 e-tron or the Mercedes GLC is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Lexus UX and the Mazda CX-30, both models stand out in the competitive compact crossover segment, yet they cater to different priorities. The Lexus UX excels with its luxurious interior and top-notch safety features, making it a desirable choice for those …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Opel Mokka
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Opel Mokka is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
Mercedes GLC

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
50,300 - 82,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
122 - 714 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 214 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,985 - 2,535 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,890 - 1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
475 - 575 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
186 - 489 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
380 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
137 - 360 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 - 2,999 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E, F, A, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.