@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs MINI Countryman - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 31500 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or MINI Countryman?

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

MINI Countryman

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the MINI Countryman costs 31500 £. That’s a price difference of around 6308 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MINI Countryman manages with 4.60 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman has a decisively edge – offering 313 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 127 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the MINI Countryman performs somewhat better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Countryman pulls decisively stronger with 494 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 254 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is somewhat lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1620 kg. The difference is around 165 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MINI Countryman offers to a small extent more room – 505 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MINI Countryman performs slight better – up to 1530 L, which is about 124 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, MINI Countryman barely noticeable takes the win – 500 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the MINI Countryman shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £31,500
Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

MINI Countryman

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 313 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7.8 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.7 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 432 - 462 km
details
Mazda CX-30
MINI Countryman

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

MINI Countryman

The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.

details
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews MINI Countryman

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
MINI Countryman
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
31500 - 45300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.7 - 16.8 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
432 - 462 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
64.60 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1620 - 2075 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4444 - 4447 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1843 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1635 - 1661 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1450 - 1530 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
460 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
163 - 313 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 250 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
120 - 230 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
MINI

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
MINI Countryman
VS
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer and MINI Countryman go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q2
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.