VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mitsubishi Outlander – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-30 or Mitsubishi Outlander fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 17614 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.90 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 306 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Outlander is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs to a small extent better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 34 km/h.

Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is convincingly lighter – 1455 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 615 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers a bit more room – 495 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1406 L, which is about 2 L more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander to a small extent takes the win – 595 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi Outlander proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi Outlander is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £42,800

Mitsubishi Outlander

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.80 L
  • Electric Range : 83 - 85 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1)
rate

The Outlander continues to impress with its spacious interior and versatile seating options, making it a top choice for families on the go. With its sleek design and thoughtful features, this SUV effortlessly combines style and practicality, ensuring a comfortable ride for all passengers. Additionally, the Outlander's advanced safety technologies provide peace of mind, making it a reliable companion for both daily commutes and weekend adventures.

details

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Skoda Kamiq, buyers are treated to two distinct takes on the compact SUV segment. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and space efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both offer a compelling blend of style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Mazda CX-30
Mitsubishi Outlander
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
42800 - 51000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
19 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
53 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
495 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4719 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1862 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
545 - 595 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
170 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
2360 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Nissan X-Trail
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV market, the Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander stand out with their distinct features and capabilities. The X-Trail boasts a spacious interior and advanced safety technology, making it an excellent choice for families, while the Outlander impresses with its impressive off-road prowess and hybrid options. Ultimately, consumers will need to consider their priorities, whether it's passenger comfort or versatility, to decide which model aligns best with their lifestyle.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 showcases its premium interior and striking design, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and comfort. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Vitara stands out with its rugged versatility and off-road capabilities, making it a great choice for adventurous drivers. Ultimately, while both SUVs offer unique strengths, the decision will hinge on personal preferences regarding style versus practicality.
Mitsubishi Outlander
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive landscape of modern SUVs, the Mitsubishi Outlander and Volkswagen Tayron stand out for their distinct offerings. The Mitsubishi Outlander impresses with its robust all-wheel-drive system and a comfortable, family-oriented interior, making it a versatile choice for both urban and off-road adventures. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron, known for its sleek design and advanced technology features, delivers a dynamic driving experience that caters to those prioritizing style and sophistication.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.