@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Mitsubishi Outlander - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 42800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Mitsubishi Outlander?

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 17614 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.90 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 306 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Outlander is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs to a small extent better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 34 km/h.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is convincingly lighter – 1455 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 615 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers a bit more room – 495 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1406 L, which is about 2 L more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander to a small extent takes the win – 595 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi Outlander proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi Outlander is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £42,800
default

Mitsubishi Outlander

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.80 L
  • Electric Range : 83 - 85 km
details
Mazda CX-30
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Mitsubishi Outlander
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
42800 - 51000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
19 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
53 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
495 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4719 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1862 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
545 - 595 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
170 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
2360 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their unique design and driving dynamics. The Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology features, making it a popular choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its stylish …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q2
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and user-friendly technology, making it a favorite among urban drivers. Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 impresses with its premium interior quality and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more refined …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.