What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

How fast can the Mazda CX-30 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 204 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-30?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 is 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1540 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Nissan Leaf have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Nissan Leaf's engine?

Depending on the version, the Nissan Leaf delivers up to 217 HP.

What is the Nissan Leaf’s energy consumption?

Average electricity consumption is 16.70 kWh.

How far can the Nissan Leaf go on a full charge?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 385 km.

How many kWh does the Nissan Leaf’s battery hold?

The Nissan Leaf comes with a 59 kWh battery.

What are the Nissan Leaf’s length, width and height?

The Nissan Leaf measures 4490 mm long, 1788 mm wide and 1540 mm high.

Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Leaf - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Nissan Leaf costs 30800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5537 £.

Leaf @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Leaf has a slightly edge – offering 217 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 31 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Leaf is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs evident better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Nissan Leaf tops out at 157 km/h. The difference is around 47 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Leaf pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 340 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1580 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers slight more room – 430 L compared to 394 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs clearly better – up to 1406 L, which is about 616 L more than the Nissan Leaf.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 somewhat takes the win – 496 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Nissan Leaf shows itself to be leads convincingly overall and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Nissan Leaf

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

VS

The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

CUPRA Formentor

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

VS

The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.

Costs and Consumption
Price 25200 - 36800 £	Price 30800 - 37200 £
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 17.8 kWh
Electric Range -	Electric Range 270 - 385 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 39 - 59 kWh
co2 129 - 148 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 48 - 51 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg	Curb weight 1580 - 1756 kg
Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L	Trunk capacity 385 - 394 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 4490 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1788 mm
Height 1540 mm	Height 1540 - 1545 mm
Max trunk capacity 1398 - 1406 L	Max trunk capacity 790 L
Payload 458 - 496 kg	Payload 384 - 415 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 150 - 217 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.9 - 7.9 s
Max Speed 191 - 204 km/h	Max Speed 144 - 157 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 320 - 340 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 110 - 160 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity -