@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Porsche Panamera – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Porsche Panamera?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Porsche Panamera costs 99800 £. That’s a price difference of around 74537 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Porsche Panamera manages with 3 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 2.70 L per 100 km.

Panamera @ Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Porsche Panamera has a significantly edge – offering 782 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 596 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 5.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Porsche Panamera performs evident better – reaching 325 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 121 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Porsche Panamera pulls clearly stronger with 1000 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 760 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers slightly more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is noticeable lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1960 kg. The difference is around 505 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Porsche Panamera offers to a small extent more room – 494 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 64 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs minimal better – up to 1406 L, which is about 21 L more than the Porsche Panamera.

When it comes to payload, Porsche Panamera barely noticeable takes the win – 545 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Porsche Panamera proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Porsche Panamera is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £99,800
Panamera @ Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG

Porsche Panamera

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 353 - 782 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3 - 12 L
  • Electric Range : 83 - 97 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Porsche Panamera

The Porsche Panamera stands as a testament to the seamless fusion of luxury and performance in the automotive world. With its sleek design and powerful engine, it offers an exhilarating driving experience that is hard to rival. Inside, the Panamera boasts a meticulously crafted interior with top-of-the-line materials, ensuring comfort and sophistication on every journey.

details
S20_5507_fine @ Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
S20_5506_fine @ Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
S20_5493_fine @ Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
S20_5480_fine @ Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Mazda CX-30
Porsche Panamera
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Panamera @ Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
99800 - 212100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
3 - 12 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
83 - 97 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
21.80 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
69 - 274 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
75 - 90 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1960 - 2535 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
421 - 494 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
5052 - 5204 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1937 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1415 - 1428 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1255 - 1385 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
340 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
353 - 782 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 5.3 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
270 - 325 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
500 - 1000 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
260 - 575 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
2894 - 3996 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Porsche

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Mokka
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.