@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Renault Arkana – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Renault Arkana?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £. That’s a price difference of around 3223 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a distinct edge – offering 186 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs slightly better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 32 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-30 pulls to a small extent stronger with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers slightly more room – 480 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs a bit better – up to 1406 L, which is about 143 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 hardly perceptible takes the win – 496 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
r210653p @ Renault Group Media
r210654p @ Renault Group Media
r210665p @ Renault Group Media
r210657p @ Renault Group Media
r210613p @ Renault Group Media
r210616p @ Renault Group Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Arkana
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the latest showdown between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz, two distinct design philosophies come to the forefront. The Arkana impresses with its sporty coupe-SUV silhouette and practical versatility, making it perfect for urban drivers who crave style and functionality. Meanwhile, …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Arkana
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Peugeot 3008
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover arena, the Peugeot 3008 and Renault Arkana each offer compelling features for the discerning driver. The Peugeot 3008 impresses with its chic interior and intuitive i-Cockpit design, delivering a sophisticated driving experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana combines …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.