@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Renault Mégane – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-30 meets Renault Mégane.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Renault Mégane costs 35100 £. That’s a price difference of around 9823 £.

Mégane @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Mégane has a to a small extent edge – offering 218 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Mégane is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs noticeable better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Renault Mégane tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 44 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Mégane pulls a bit stronger with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slightly lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1719 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers barely noticeable more room – 430 L compared to 389 L. That’s a difference of about 41 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1406 L, which is about 74 L more than the Renault Mégane.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 to a small extent takes the win – 496 kg compared to 446 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be performs better in key areas and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Renault Mégane

The Renault Mégane blends Gallic flair with practical everyday charm, showing that sensible transport can still have personality and poise. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want a comfortable, stylish hatchback that feels a little more special than the usual commute companion.

details
r211807p @ Renault Group Media
r211799p @ Renault Group Media
r211793p @ Renault Group Media
r211756p @ Renault Group Media
r211745p @ Renault Group Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Mégane
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mégane @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
35100 - 38500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.40 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
452 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1719 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
389 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4200 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1783 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1505 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1332 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
446 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.40 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
160 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
160 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

@ Renault Group Media
Renault Captur
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Mégane
VS
In the world of compact French automobiles, the Renault Captur and Renault Mégane stand out with their distinct appeals. The Captur, with its elevated ride height and crossover styling, offers a youthful and versatile option for urban adventurers, featuring a spacious cabin and a host of …
@ Fiat / Stellantis Media
Fiat Tipo Hatchback
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Mégane
VS
Fiat Tipo Hatchback and Renault Mégane go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.