VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Renault R5 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Renault R5?

Mazda CX-30 vs Renault R5: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Renault R5

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault R5 is marginally cheaper – starting at 24,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,705 £.

R5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers moderately more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault R5 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault R5 delivers barely more torque with 245 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault R5 is barely lighter – 1,447 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 8 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers noticeably more boot space – 430 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries somewhat more – 496 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R5 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,000
R5

Renault R5

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 150 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 307 - 405 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
Choosing between the retro-inspired Renault 5 and the practical VW ID.3 comes down to whether you value character and compact city agility or proven electric range and grown-up practicality. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each car shines and which one fits different kinds …
Renault R5
CUPRA Raval
VS
The Renault R5 and the CUPRA Raval represent two very different takes on the compact electric car — the Renault R5 leans on retro charm and urban practicality, while the CUPRA Raval emphasizes sporty dynamics and bold design. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they stack up on …
Mazda CX-30
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault R5

The Renault 5 blends classic styling cues with contemporary design, giving it a playful and characterful presence on the road. It’s a city-focused hatchback that feels nimble and cleverly packaged, ideal for drivers who want personality and practicality.

details
D9BB3E56-4B0D-4E48-A734-11A1714B92A5
79A3C149-BC71-4BE3-A149-986DD84D251C
DDEACB99-545B-4C72-B12C-AB35E7B77365

Reviews Renault R5

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Petra
7 Aug 2026, 14:01:03

B
Impressed. Very good seats, super easy to use (self-explanatory), very brisk with great suspension. Sticks to the road even in the tightest corners.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Walter
4 Nov 2025, 21:42:46

Practical, nimble, and fun to drive. For rather small drivers up to 1.75 m there's plenty of space even on the back seat. Useful driver-assist systems, and Android Auto works well. Very economical in summer. In winter a lot of energy is used in the first five minutes to bring the battery up to 20°C, which makes consumption on short winter trips very high.

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
Kia EV2
VS
The Renault 5 and the Kia EV2 represent two different takes on the compact electric — the Renault 5 leans on retro styling and urban agility, while the Kia EV2 focuses on modern practicality and value. This comparison will help you decide between personality and usable space by looking at range, …
Renault R5
VW ID.Polo
VS
This short comparison pits the Renault 5 against the Volkswagen ID. Polo to help you choose which compact electric suits your needs. We'll focus on design, range, practicality, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the right city car.
CUPRA Born
Renault R5
VS
The CUPRA Born feels grown-up and focused — a proper hot‑hatch–inspired EV with genuine pace, sensible range and more practical space than its looks suggest, while the Renault 5 is a cheeky, retro‑flavoured city car built to charm tight streets rather than scorch the autobahn. Choose the Born if …
Renault R5
Renault Twingo
VS
Deciding between the Renault 5 and the Renault Twingo comes down to whether you prefer the retro-inspired style and modern reinterpretation of the 5 or the Twingo’s proven compact practicality. This comparison focuses on driving character, interior space, running costs and everyday usability to …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Renault R5
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Renault 5 is a retro‑inspired, city‑focused electric hatch that prioritizes style and zippy urban range; the Toyota Yaris is a compact, practical hatch offered with proven hybrid efficiency, everyday usability and mature safety tech. Pick the Renault 5 if you want charismatic design and a …
Mazda CX-30
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
24,000 - 27,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,447 - 1,524 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,744 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
396 - 418 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.