VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Elroq comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Skoda Elroq?

Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Elroq: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Elroq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 32,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,814 £.

Elroq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 154 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 439 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is markedly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,036 kg. The difference is around 581 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers only slightly more boot space – 470 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries only slightly more – 549 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 441 - 574 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

details
1_skoda_elroq_166e0554
2_skoda_elroq_b393d405
28_skoda_elroq_3a5d05f5

Reviews Skoda Elroq

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Kay
2 Mar 2026, 11:27:36

We’ve been driving the Elroq 85 Sportline for four weeks. Nice SUV — functional and not overdone. Downside for me: software issues. Infotainment crashed once so far, and the traffic-sign recognition isn’t updating (often shows outdated roadworks).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
ygfg
16 Feb 2026, 01:00:58

yg

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Franz E.
21 Nov 2025, 11:43:00

Excellent value for money; top-notch equipment.

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
Think of the Volvo EX40 as the cool, safety-obsessed Swede — minimalist cabin, clever tech and a calm, premium feel — while the Skoda Elroq is all about everyday practicality: roomy, sensible and great value for money. Want Scandinavian refinement and understated luxury? Pick the EX40; want space, …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV arrives with true American muscle—room for the whole crew, solid range and tow-ready guts—perfect if you want a family hauler that eats motorways for breakfast. The Skoda Elroq, by contrast, is a nimble, value-packed city specialist with clever storage and low running costs, …
Hyundai IONIQ 5
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Skoda Elroq offer two distinct takes on the compact electric crossover: the IONIQ 5 shines with bold styling, rapid charging and advanced tech, while the Elroq prioritises practical space, sensible packaging and everyday usability. Your choice will hinge on whether you value …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Packed into a compact electric package, the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers premium polish and slick tech while the Skoda Elroq plays the clever-value card with roomy practicality and a friendlier price tag. Which one should sit in your garage — the status-savvy Q4 e-tron or the no-nonsense Elroq? We’ll …
Toyota bZ4X
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Toyota bZ4X stakes its claim as a sensible, go-anywhere electric with Toyota toughness and straightforward tech, while the Skoda Elroq answers with clever packaging, sharper styling and a dose of European practicality. In this short showdown we’ll cut through badges and specs to tell you which …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Line them up and the electric VW ID.3 comes off as the clever, zippy high-tech hatch you want for city runs and engaging driving, while the Skoda Elroq plays the straight man—roomy, practical and relentlessly sensible. Pick the ID.3 for zero‑emission fun and gadgetry; go for the Elroq if everyday …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
470 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,884 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
482 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.