Compare performance (186 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 33,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or SsangYong Torres?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the SUV market continues to expand, two vehicles that have captured attention for their unique offerings are the Mazda CX-30 and the SsangYong Torres. Both models boast distinct characteristics that cater to different consumer needs. In this article, we’ll dive deeper into the technical aspects and innovative features of these two remarkable SUVs.
The Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek and modern design, standing at 4395 mm in length, 1795 mm in width, and 1540 mm in height. This compact SUV promotes a feeling of agility while still providing sufficient passenger space. It features a stylish five-door layout and can comfortably seat five occupants.
In contrast, the SsangYong Torres is larger, measuring 4700 mm in length, 1890 mm in width, and 1710 mm in height. This considerable size translates to a more robust presence on the road. With a spacious five-door design, the Torres offers ample room for both passengers and cargo.
Under the hood, the Mazda CX-30 is available in two petrol MHEV engine options delivering a robust power output of 140 to 186 HP. This SUV delivers a balance of performance and efficiency, with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranging from 8.3 seconds to 10.3 seconds. The engine options come paired with either a manual or an automatic transmission and offer front-wheel or all-wheel drive configurations.
The SsangYong Torres, on the other hand, also offers a versatile engine lineup. Customers can choose from petrol and electric options, with power ranging from 163 to 207 HP. Notably, the electric variant boasts an impressive electric range of 462 km, making it appealing for eco-conscious drivers. Torques reach up to 339 Nm, providing a strong pull, particularly beneficial for off-road adventures. Like the CX-30, it also offers both manual and automatic transmissions with front-wheel or all-wheel drive capabilities.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Mazda CX-30 edges out slightly with a consumption range of 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, showcasing Mazda’s commitment to creating more efficient engines. The CO2 emissions also reflect positively, ranging from 129 to 148 g/km.
The SsangYong Torres, however, has a consumption rating of 7.9 to 9.1 L/100km for its petrol engines, while its electric model offers a unique metric of 18.7 kWh/100km. The Torres reflects a CO2 efficiency class from G (for petrol) to A (for electric), underlining its potential for zero emissions travel.
Inside the Mazda CX-30, drivers will find a premium cabin with high-quality materials and the latest infotainment technology. The vehicle features a trunk capacity of 430 liters, sufficient for daily needs. A range of driver-assistance technologies enhances the driving experience, making it both enjoyable and safe.
The SsangYong Torres aims at offering a more spacious interior with a trunk capacity of 703 liters, providing excellent utility for families or individuals needing extra cargo space. It also comes equipped with modern infotainment features and safety technologies to ensure a connected and secure driving environment.
Ultimately, the Mazda CX-30 and SsangYong Torres are both excellent choices within the SUV segment, each tailored for different types of consumers. The CX-30 is a refined, efficient option for those who value fuel economy and stylish design. In contrast, the Torres offers a larger footprint with innovative electric options, making it a compelling choice for families and eco-conscious drivers alike. The decision between these two vehicles will largely come down to personal priorities, be it efficiency, size, or innovative features.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-30 is markedly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the SsangYong Torres costs 33,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,143 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the SsangYong Torres with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Torres offers moderately more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Torres delivers clearly more torque with 339 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 99 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is barely lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 43 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Torres offers markedly more boot space – 703 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 273 L.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Torres carries somewhat more – 552 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.
The SsangYong Torres is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
SsangYong Torres cuts a rugged, purposeful silhouette that feels more expensive than its price tag, offering generously practical packaging and a no-nonsense feature set. It drives with surprisingly assured manners and genuine off-road appetite, making it a clever choice for buyers who want real SUV capability without badge snobbery.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
|
Price
33,800 - 44,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
462 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
0 - 207 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,618 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
703 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,700 mm
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,710 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,662 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
552 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España