VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Subaru Forester – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Subaru Forester?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Subaru Forester costs 34700 £. That’s a price difference of around 9471 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-30 manages with 5.70 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Subaru Forester with 8.10 L. The difference is about 2.40 L per 100 km.

Forester @ Subaru

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 186 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Subaru Forester takes 12.20 s. That’s about 3.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs slight better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Subaru Forester tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-30 pulls evident stronger with 240 Nm compared to 182 Nm. That’s about 58 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slightly lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1693 kg. The difference is around 238 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Subaru Forester offers slightly more room – 508 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Subaru Forester performs slightly better – up to 1731 L, which is about 325 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 hardly perceptible takes the win – 496 kg compared to 492 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Subaru Forester

The Subaru Forester is a versatile SUV known for its impressive off-road capabilities and practical design. With a spacious interior and advanced safety features, it offers comfort and security for both city driving and outdoor adventures. Its reliable performance and all-wheel-drive system make it a popular choice among those who appreciate a combination of functionality and rugged charm.

details
csm_ATP_3588_26cd8d3e91 @ Subaru
csm_ATP_3846_b1acfd59d3 @ Subaru
csm_ATP_3796_e529e6d83f @ Subaru
csm_ATP_3939_15099a6c78 @ Subaru
csm_ATP_4012_b1f29ad2a5 @ Subaru

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Subaru Forester
CX-30
Forester

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
34700 - 42200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
8.10 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
183 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1693 - 1739 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
508 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4670 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1830 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1730 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1679 - 1731 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
446 - 492 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.20 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
188 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
182 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
100 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1995 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Subaru

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Subaru Forester
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the battle between the Subaru Forester and the upcoming Dacia Bigster, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating contrast of capability and style. The Forester, lauded for its legendary symmetrical all-wheel-drive system and reliability, appeals to those seeking a rugged and proven performance. Meanwhile, the Dacia Bigster, with its eye-catching design and affordable pricing, promises a fresh take on practicality and space for budget-conscious adventurers.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers practicality and comfort, boasting advanced safety features and a spacious interior, ideal for family-oriented drivers.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.