VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota RAV4 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Toyota RAV4?

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota RAV4: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • slightly lighter

Toyota RAV4

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Toyota RAV4 costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,900 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota RAV4 uses 1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.7 L/100km.

RAV4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota RAV4 offers noticeably more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota RAV4 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,745 kg. The difference is around 290 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota RAV4 offers clearly more boot space – 580 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 150 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota RAV4 carries a bit more – 600 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota RAV4 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
RAV4

Toyota RAV4

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 218 - 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
BYD Seal U
Toyota RAV4
VS
BYD Seal U is a sleek, driver‑focused electric newcomer that delivers brisk, silent acceleration, cutting‑edge tech and impressive running‑cost savings — it’s the car that makes you forget what an internal‑combustion soundtrack sounded like. The Toyota RAV4 sticks to its strengths: rugged, roomy …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota RAV4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota RAV4

The Toyota RAV4 feels like a sensible friend on the road, marrying dependable practicality with a dash of SUV personality that keeps daily driving from turning dull. Comfortable and easy to live with, it looks tough without shouting and quietly gets the job done — a sensible pick for buyers who want versatility without drama.

details
73487-rav4prexterior34front-web-lr
73488-rav4prexterior34rear-web-lr
77636-2023rav4ext001-web-lr
73489-rav4printeriordashboard-web-lr

Reviews Toyota RAV4

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Mariana González
5 Jan 2026, 23:15:27

I love it — it’s super comfortable, I’ve never had any trouble with it, very reliable and stable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Suzuki Across
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Suzuki Across feels like the RAV4's cheeky twin — the same sharp plug‑in hybrid drivetrain and near-identical performance, just wearing Suzuki's badge and a slightly different face. If you want proven Toyota ubiquity and resale strength, stick with the RAV4; if you fancy the same tech with a …
Toyota RAV4
Toyota Urban Cruiser
VS
Toyota RAV4 and Toyota Urban Cruiser go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Nissan Qashqai
Toyota RAV4
VS
Nissan's Qashqai is the urbane compact crossover that prioritises comfort, slick cabin tech and a city-friendly footprint, while Toyota's RAV4 leans into rugged practicality, bigger boot space and available hybrid power for long-distance economy. Choose the Qashqai if you want a refined, …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota RAV4

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
35,100 - 55,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
22 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,745 - 1,910 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
520 - 580 L
Length
-
Length
4,600 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
1,685 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,604 - 1,690 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
390 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
218 - 306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
160 - 225 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,487 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.