VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Volvo EX30 – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-30 or Volvo EX30 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Volvo EX30 costs 33000 £. That’s a price difference of around 7757 £.

EX30 @ Volvo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 has a clearly edge – offering 428 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 242 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.60 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 4.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs a bit better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Volvo EX30 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX30 pulls significantly stronger with 543 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 303 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is noticeable lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1840 kg. The difference is around 385 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers evident more room – 430 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 112 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs distinct better – up to 1406 L, which is about 406 L more than the Volvo EX30.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 clearly perceptible takes the win – 496 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 106 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Volvo EX30 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo EX30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £33,000
313302_Volvo_EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 339 - 476 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 represents a bold step forward for the brand, combining advanced technology with sustainable design principles. Its sleek and compact exterior belies a spacious interior that offers a premium driving experience. With a focus on safety and innovation, this model reflects Volvo's commitment to shaping the future of urban mobility.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30 @ Volvo
313320_Volvo_EX30 @ Volvo
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior @ Volvo
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior @ Volvo
313297_Volvo_EX30 @ Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and peace-of-mind crashworthiness, the EX30 is the smarter, faster pick.
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Mazda CX-30
Volvo EX30
CX-30
EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
33000 - 49100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.7 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1840 - 1960 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4233 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1838 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1550 - 1567 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1000 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX30
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric SUV market, the Ford Explorer EV stands out with its roomy interior and robust performance, making it a strong contender for families on the go. In contrast, the Volvo EX30 emphasizes safety and sustainability, combining cutting-edge technology with a compact design that appeals to urban drivers. Both models showcase the future of electric mobility, but each caters to distinct lifestyles and preferences.
Volvo EX30
Kia EV4 Hatchback
VS
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EX30 and the VW ID.3, each electric vehicle showcases its own unique strengths. The EX30 impresses with its Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, while the ID.3 highlights its spacious interior and impressive range for everyday driving. Ultimately, both models cater to eco-conscious consumers, but their differing philosophies make them appealing to varied tastes in the EV market.
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
In the rapidly growing electric vehicle market, the Volvo EX30 and EX40 stand out with their unique blend of style and sustainability. While the EX30 offers a smaller, more urban-friendly footprint, the EX40 boasts additional space and features tailored for family-oriented drivers. Both models showcase Volvo's commitment to safety and innovation, making them compelling choices for environmentally conscious consumers.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.