VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 210 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 51,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Alfa Romeo Stelvio?

Mazda CX-60 vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space

Alfa Romeo Stelvio

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • barely lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

CX-60

Alfa Romeo Stelvio vs. Mazda CX-60: A Comprehensive Car Comparison

The SUV market continues to expand, driven by innovations in technology, performance, and sustainability. Two standout models in this category are the Alfa Romeo Stelvio and the Mazda CX-60. Both vehicles exhibit unique characteristics and appeal, making it essential for prospective buyers to understand their differences and strengths. Here, we will delve into various aspects of these two remarkable SUVs, including technical specifications and innovations that set them apart from each other.

Stelvio

Performance and Engine Options

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio offers a diverse range of engine choices, including petrol and diesel engines with power outputs ranging from 210 to 280 HP. The sporty model can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in just 5.7 seconds, boasting a maximum speed of 230 km/h. With an automatic gearbox and an all-wheel-drive system, the Stelvio provides a thrilling driving experience.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-60 comes with a more eco-friendly approach, offering both plug-in hybrid and diesel MHEV options. The top-end model produces an impressive 327 HP, making it capable of reaching 0-100 km/h in 5.8 seconds. The CX-60's maximum speed, however, is slightly lower, capped at 219 km/h. With all-wheel drive available on many trims, this vehicle provides robust performance while maintaining efficiency.

CX-60

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Fuel efficiency is an increasingly vital consideration for modern SUV buyers. The Stelvio has a fuel consumption rate ranging from 6 to 11.8 L/100km, depending on the engine. With CO2 emissions reaching up to 267 g/km in some configurations, the Stelvio is aimed at performance enthusiasts rather than environmentally-conscious drivers.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60 shines in the fuel economy department, particularly with its plug-in hybrid variant, which boasts an astonishing consumption of just 1.4 L/100km. Moreover, its CO2 efficiency class ranges from B to E, highlighting a clear commitment to reducing environmental impact.

Stelvio

Interior Space and Comfort

Both the Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Mazda CX-60 support a 5-seat configuration, but their interior dimensions differ slightly. The Stelvio offers 525 liters of trunk capacity, optimized for practicality without compromising style. In comparison, the CX-60 provides slightly more trunk space at 570 liters, catering to families and individuals who prioritize storage capabilities.

Interior quality in both vehicles is exceptional; the Stelvio emphasizes luxury with high-quality materials and sophisticated design, reflecting Alfa Romeo's heritage. The Mazda CX-60 stands out for its modern aesthetic and advanced technology integrations, ensuring comfort and convenience for all passengers.

CX-60

Technological Innovations

When it comes to technology, both models incorporate cutting-edge features. The Stelvio is equipped with a highly responsive infotainment system, offering seamless connectivity and navigation options, all complemented by a high-resolution display. Advanced safety features, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance, add to its appeal.

The Mazda CX-60, however, takes a different approach with its robust driver-assistance technologies. An impressive suite of safety systems, combined with a smartphone-friendly interface and a premium audio experience, establishes Mazda's commitment to a tech-savvy driving experience.

Stelvio

Final Thoughts: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the Alfa Romeo Stelvio and the Mazda CX-60 boils down to personal preferences. If you seek thrilling performance and Italian flair, the Stelvio will undoubtedly cater to your desires. Conversely, for those prioritizing efficiency, space, and advanced technology, the CX-60 emerges as a clear winner.

Both SUVs present compelling arguments, and it’s essential for buyers to consider their individual needs before making a decision. In a market brimming with options, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Mazda CX-60 continue to stand out, each offering a unique flavor in the ever-evolving SUV landscape.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 is slightly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Stelvio costs 51,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,271 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio with 6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.

Stelvio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 210 HP. That’s roughly 117 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Alfa Romeo Stelvio takes 6.6 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers moderately more torque with 550 Nm compared to 470 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alfa Romeo Stelvio is barely lighter – 1,820 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 70 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers only slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 525 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries marginally more – 612 kg compared to 590 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
Mazda CX-60
Alfa Romeo Stelvio

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

Alfa Romeo Stelvio

The Alfa Romeo Stelvio combines Italian artistry with sporty performance, making it a standout in the SUV market. Its dynamic design captures the essence of elegance and agility, while the interior offers a driver-focused experience that enhances every journey. With a perfect blend of luxury and power, the Stelvio is ideal for those seeking both style and substance on the road.

details
Mazda CX-60
Alfa Romeo Stelvio

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
51,900 - 56,700 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,820 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
525 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,903 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
590 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
210 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
470 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
154 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,143 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Alfa Romeo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.