VS

Mazda CX-60 vs KGM Rexton comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or KGM Rexton?

Mazda CX-60 vs KGM Rexton: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
details

KGM Rexton

  • only slightly cheaper
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

KGM Rexton is only slightly cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,537 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the KGM Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 4.4 L/100km.

Rexton

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers markedly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 125 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the KGM Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers a bit more torque with 550 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 109 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: KGM Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is marginally lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

Looking at boot space, the KGM Rexton offers clearly more boot space – 784 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 214 L.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Rexton carries noticeably more – 845 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 233 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
Mazda CX-60
KGM Rexton

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details

KGM Rexton

The Rexton is a roomy, rugged SUV that prioritizes comfort and practical utility, making it a sensible choice for families and buyers who need genuine off-road capability. It offers solid refinement and a generous equipment level for the money, though the brand still trails more mainstream rivals in recognition.

details
Mazda CX-60
KGM Rexton

Costs and Consumption

Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
41,100 - 50,900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.2 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
216 - 219 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,105 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,960 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
730 - 845 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
149 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
KGM
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.