VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes EQT comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Mercedes EQT?

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes EQT: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mercedes EQT is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,897 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQT offers considerably more range – reaching up to 278 km, about 215 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

EQT

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 205 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 6.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is only slightly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers marginally more boot space – 570 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries somewhat more – 612 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes EQT

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details
23C0128_203_1
23C0128_111_1
23C0128_107_1
23C0128_006_0
23C0128_212_1

Reviews Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Nissan X-Trail
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Nissan X-Trail compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes EQT

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Length
-
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
-
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
457 - 531 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
132 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
90 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.