VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Nissan Interstar?

Mazda CX-60 vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • marginally lighter
details

Nissan Interstar

  • visibly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Interstar is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,512 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers significantly more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 347 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers significantly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers visibly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-60 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is marginally lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 163 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 835 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-60
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
serpimg_9dGXeC

Reviews Nissan Interstar

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Jaguar F-Pace and the Mazda CX-60 showcase distinct strengths suited to different preferences. The Jaguar F-Pace impresses with its refined luxury, striking design, and dynamic performance, making it an engaging choice for those seeking advanced driving …
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the compact SUV showdown between the Kia Sportage and the Mazda CX-60, each vehicle demonstrates its unique strengths. The Kia Sportage captivates with its impressive tech features, spacious interior, and commendable fuel efficiency, making it ideal for both city commutes and long drives. …
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety …
Mazda CX-60
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
410 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.