VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Peugeot 408 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Peugeot 408?

Mazda CX-60 vs Peugeot 408: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • markedly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot 408 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,554 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 408 uses 2.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot 408 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 392 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

408

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers markedly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Peugeot 408 takes 7.2 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers markedly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 408 is markedly lighter – 1,544 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 346 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers marginally more boot space – 570 L compared to 536 L. That’s a difference of about 34 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries noticeably more – 612 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 156 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 408 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
408

Peugeot 408

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 225 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.7 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 79 - 455 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 3008
Peugeot 408
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the clever compact SUV with a raised stance and family-friendly practicality, while the Peugeot 408 slips into crossover-coupe territory with sleeker lines and a more road-focused ride. Choose the 3008 for sensible versatility and roomy practicality, or the 408 if you crave …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-60
Peugeot 408

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Peugeot 408

The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.

details
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC523
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC516
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC519
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC522
PEUGEOT_408_TESTDRIVE_2211TC032

Reviews Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Klaudia
15 Jan 2026, 19:46:29

This is one of the most beautiful cars of our time, in an era when every brand churns out cookie‑cutter models — as long as they look like an SUV. It's comfortable, incredibly spacious, picks up nicely on the road and always makes a great impression everywhere ;)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Peugeot 308 SW
Peugeot 408
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact family cars, the Peugeot 308 SW and Peugeot 408 stand out with their unique offerings. While the 308 SW impresses with its practicality and spaciousness, thanks to its estate design, the 408 delivers a more dynamic silhouette combined with a premium interior …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-60
VS
Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-60
Peugeot 408

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
79 - 455 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
58.2 kWh
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 - 114 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
471 - 536 L
Length
-
Length
4,687 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Height
-
Height
1,478 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,528 - 1,583 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
371 - 456 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
160 - 233 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.