VS

Mazda CX-60 vs SEAT Ateca – Differences & prices compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-60 or SEAT Ateca?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

SEAT Ateca has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25100 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 16800 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the SEAT Ateca with 4.90 L. The difference is about 3.50 L per 100 km.

Ateca @ seat-mediacenter.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a clearly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the SEAT Ateca takes 9 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 219 km/h, while the SEAT Ateca tops out at 202 km/h. The difference is around 17 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, SEAT Ateca is clearly lighter – 1345 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 545 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slightly more room – 570 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs minimal better – up to 1726 L, which is about 122 L more than the SEAT Ateca.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 slightly takes the win – 612 kg compared to 525 kg. That’s a difference of about 87 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-60 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £41,900
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

SEAT Ateca

5 (1)
rate

The SEAT Ateca stands out with its dynamic design, perfectly blending style and functionality for urban and rural settings alike. Inside, it offers a spacious and comfortable cabin, complete with advanced technology and intuitive controls that enhance the driving experience. On the road, the Ateca delivers a balanced performance, providing a smooth ride with agile handling that makes it versatile for various driving conditions.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.com
SEAT-Ateca_012 @ seat-mediacenter.com
SEAT-Ateca_011 @ seat-mediacenter.com
SEAT-Ateca_006 @ seat-mediacenter.com
SEAT-Ateca_004 @ seat-mediacenter.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want reliable family transport without the show-off price tag.
Mazda CX-60
SEAT Ateca
CX-60
Ateca

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
25100 - 36900 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
129 - 144 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1345 - 1514 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
510 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4381 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1841 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1601 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1604 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
516 - 525 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
183 - 202 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1968 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
SEAT

Similar Comparisons

SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology features. Both vehicles provide ample space and versatility, making them ideal choices for urban lifestyles, but each has its unique flair to cater to different tastes.
Kia Sportage
SEAT Ateca
VS
When comparing the Kia Sportage and the SEAT Ateca, both models stand out for their blend of style and practicality. The Sportage boasts a more spacious interior and a comprehensive suite of tech features, appealing to families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Ateca offers agile handling and a sporty design, making it a great choice for those who prioritize driving dynamics and aesthetics.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Mazda CX-60
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and practicality. Ultimately, choosing between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each caters to distinct needs in the booming SUV market.
Hyundai Tucson
SEAT Ateca
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Hyundai Tucson and SEAT Ateca stand out with their distinct personalities and features. The Tucson offers a spacious interior with a modern, tech-savvy design, making it an ideal family vehicle, while the Ateca impresses with its sporty styling and engaging driving dynamics. Both models excel in safety and efficiency, catering to different preferences, but ultimately, the choice comes down to whether you prioritize practicality or a more spirited driving experience.
CUPRA Ateca
SEAT Ateca
VS
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq offer distinct yet appealing options for buyers. The Ateca impresses with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it a favorite among those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Kamiq stands out for its practicality and spacious interior, ideal for families and city dwellers seeking comfort and versatility.
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.