What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-60?

Depending on the version, the Mazda CX-60 delivers up to 327 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Mazda CX-60 in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 1.40 L.

What is the Mazda CX-60’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 64 km.

How fast can the Mazda CX-60 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 219 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-60?

Depending on configuration, up to 570 L fit inside.

How big is the Mazda CX-60 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-60 is 4745 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1680 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Skoda Karoq?

The Skoda Karoq is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Karoq?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Karoq delivers up to 190 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Karoq according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Skoda Karoq consumes 4.90 L.

What are the Skoda Karoq’s length, width and height?

The Skoda Karoq measures 4390 mm long, 1841 mm wide and 1624 mm high.

Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Karoq – Which car gives you more for your money? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Karoq has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 12823 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.90 L. The difference is about 3.50 L per 100 km.

Karoq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a convincingly edge – offering 327 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 137 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Skoda Karoq takes 7 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs slight better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls noticeable stronger with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Karoq is noticeable lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 510 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers minimal more room – 570 L compared to 521 L. That’s a difference of about 49 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1726 L, which is about 96 L more than the Skoda Karoq.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 slightly takes the win – 612 kg compared to 549 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-60 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Skoda Karoq

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company

Hyundai Tucson

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

VS

The Hyundai Tucson delivers futuristic styling, a roomy, tech-rich cabin and punchy powertrains that make it the practical yet showy family SUV in this duel. The Skoda Karoq, meanwhile, trades flash for cleverness — smaller and sharper to drive with brilliant storage solutions and better everyday …

@ Kia Corporation

Kia Sportage

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

VS

The Kia Sportage flaunts a bolder design, plush cabin and tech-heavy kit that feels like buying the future — perfect if you want comfort and a bit of showmanship on your commute. The Skoda Karoq plays the sensible sibling: conservative looks, clever packaging, enjoyable handling and better value, …

Costs and Consumption
Price 41900 - 56800 £	Price 29100 - 41700 £
Consumption L/100km 1.4 - 5.4 L	Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 64 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 31 - 139 g/km	co2 128 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 - 58 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1890 - 2055 kg	Curb weight 1380 - 1655 kg
Trunk capacity 570 L	Trunk capacity 521 L
Length 4745 mm	Length 4384 - 4390 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1841 mm
Height 1680 - 1688 mm	Height 1624 - 1629 mm
Max trunk capacity 1726 L	Max trunk capacity 1630 L
Payload 581 - 612 kg	Payload 456 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 200 - 327 HP	Power HP 115 - 190 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7 - 11.2 s
Max Speed 200 - 219 km/h	Max Speed 192 - 221 km/h
Torque 450 - 550 Nm	Torque 200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 147 - 241 kW	Power kW 85 - 140 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3