Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs VW Transporter Bus comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 286 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 41,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or VW Transporter Bus?
Mazda CX-60 vs VW Transporter Bus: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW Transporter Bus is marginally cheaper – starting at 41,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,193 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Transporter Bus uses 0.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the VW Transporter Bus offers clearly more range – reaching up to 324 km, about 261 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Transporter Bus
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers a bit more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 286 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the VW Transporter Bus takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 415 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: VW Transporter Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is marginally lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 1,998 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Transporter Bus offers markedly more boot space – 763 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 193 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW Transporter Bus carries considerably more – 1,143 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 531 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The VW Transporter Bus is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £41,500
VW Transporter Bus
Mazda CX-60
VW Transporter Bus
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
VW Transporter Bus
The VW Transporter is the Swiss Army knife of vans — rugged, practical and surprisingly civilized on the road, whether you’re hauling kit for a job or converting it into a weekend camper. It isn’t trying to be glamorous, but its blend of durability, clever packaging and familiar VW charm makes it a sensible choice for buyers who need space without sacrificing driveability.
details
Mazda CX-60
VW Transporter Bus
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
41,500 - 85,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 9.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.4 - 24.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
87 - 324 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 - 63.8 kWh
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 229 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 8
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
1,998 - 2,620 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 763 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,973 - 5,450 mm
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,941 - 2,032 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,907 - 1,997 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,672 - 4,005 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
330 - 1,143 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 286 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 16.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
112 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 415 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 210 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
VW
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.