VS

Mazda CX-60 vs XPeng G6 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 37,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or XPeng G6?

Mazda CX-60 vs XPeng G6: Key differences

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally lighter

XPeng G6

5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

XPeng G6 is slightly cheaper – starting at 37,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,300 £.

As for electric range, the XPeng G6 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 525 km, about 462 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

G6

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 offers markedly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 160 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G6 delivers somewhat more torque with 660 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is marginally lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.

Looking at boot space, the XPeng G6 offers very slightly more boot space – 571 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries markedly more – 612 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 137 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G6 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,400
G6

XPeng G6

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 252 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 455 - 525 km
details

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
XPeng G9
VS
The XPeng G6 is the nimble, value-packed option — a compact EV that squeezes impressive range and smart tech into a friendly price, ideal for buyers who want clever daily driving without flagship sticker shock. The XPeng G9, by contrast, is the full-size flagship: more power, longer range and a …
XPeng G6
ZEEKR 7X
VS
The XPeng G6 fizzes with futuristic tech, sharp handling and a coupe-like silhouette, while the ZEEKR 7X leans into space, solidity and premium materials — think gadget-hungry sportster versus grown-up tourer. On the road the G6 feels lighter and more playful with impressive efficiency and clever …
Mazda CX-60
XPeng G6

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

XPeng G6

The XPeng G6 looks like a sleeker, tech-rich alternative to conventional electric SUVs, with an interior that feels modern, airy and purposefully designed for everyday comfort. On the road it’s composed and surprisingly engaging, giving drivers a smart mix of calm refinement and a playful streak — not bad for a car that quietly challenges the usual premium suspects.

details
IMG_0237
IMG_0238

Reviews XPeng G6

5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
21 Jan 2026, 18:28:52

The Xpeng G6 strikes me as very convincing when it comes to technology, ultra-fast charging, comfort, and range — definitely worth keeping an eye on.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like the small SUV that went to design school — rear-driven poise, a near-luxury cabin and punchy petrol or PHEV options that reward drivers who crave refinement and involvement. The Toyota RAV4, by contrast, is the stubbornly sensible choice: roomier, more practical, famously …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
XPeng G6
BYD Sealion 7
VS
In the competitive landscape of electric vehicles, the XPeng G6 and BYD Sealion 7 stand out for their innovative features and striking designs. The XPeng G6 impresses with its advanced tech integration and spacious interior, appealing to tech-savvy consumers, while the BYD Sealion 7 showcases …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-60 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety …
Mazda CX-60
XPeng G6

Costs and Consumption
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Price
37,400 - 44,200 £
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
63 km
Electric Range
455 - 525 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
85 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,220 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
571 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
470 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
252 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
185 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
XPeng
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-60 have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.