VS

Mazda CX-6e vs KGM Torres EVX comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or KGM Torres EVX?

Mazda CX-6e vs KGM Torres EVX: Key differences

Mazda CX-6e

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

KGM Torres EVX

  • noticeably cheaper
  • marginally more electric range
  • moderately lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-6e

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

KGM Torres EVX is noticeably cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,428 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mazda CX-6e is very slightly more efficient: consuming 18.9 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the KGM Torres EVX. That’s a difference of about 0.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the KGM Torres EVX offers marginally more range – reaching up to 503 km, about 19 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

Torres EVX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-6e offers a bit more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 51 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-6e is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the KGM Torres EVX takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Torres EVX delivers a bit more torque with 339 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 49 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, KGM Torres EVX is moderately lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 280 kg.

Looking at boot space, the KGM Torres EVX offers visibly more boot space – 703 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 235 L.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Torres EVX carries markedly more – 510 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The KGM Torres EVX holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,400
Torres EVX

KGM Torres EVX

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 207 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.3 - 19.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 498 - 503 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Mazda CX-6e
KGM Torres EVX

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Peter
27 Jul 2026, 17:46:47

Quality is a top priority at Mazda. No engine problems like with some other manufacturers in the past. Why should it be any different as an electric car.
The equipment focuses on the essentials… Great battery..
Visually very nice…
Will shake up the upper echelons of the car market at that price..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

KGM Torres EVX

The Torres EVX presents itself as a practical and polished electric SUV, pairing a spacious, comfortable interior with a clean, contemporary design. With composed road manners and user-friendly technology, it feels like a sensible choice for drivers seeking an everyday electric family vehicle.

details
serpimg_NBXXPC

Reviews KGM Torres EVX

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Kia EV3
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Choosing between the Kia EV3 and the Mazda CX-6e comes down to what you value most — practicality, range and efficiency, or driving engagement and a more premium cabin. The EV3 leans toward efficient electric practicality and strong value, while the CX-6e emphasizes Mazda’s signature driving …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
Skoda Enyaq
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Mazda CX-6e go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Enyaq or the Mazda …
Kia EV5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Kia EV5 and Mazda CX-6e pits two fresh electric crossovers from established brands against each other, each promising a mix of range, tech and everyday practicality. This quick head-to-head will help you see which suits your driving needs and lifestyle better.
Mazda CX-6e
KGM Torres EVX

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Price
33,400 - 42,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 19.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Electric Range
498 - 503 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Curb weight
1,925 - 1,950 kg
Trunk capacity
468 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 kg
Payload
485 - 510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
258 HP
Power HP
207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
339 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
190 kW
Power kW
152 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
KGM
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-6e?

The Mazda CX-6e is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.