VS

Mazda CX-6e vs XPeng P7+ comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 503 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 39,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-6e or XPeng P7+?

Mazda CX-6e vs XPeng P7+: Key differences

Mazda CX-6e

details

XPeng P7+

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • significantly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-6e

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

XPeng P7+ is marginally cheaper – starting at 39,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,906 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the XPeng P7+ is markedly more efficient: consuming 15.2 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 3.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng P7+ offers barely more range – reaching up to 530 km, about 46 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

P7+

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7+ offers significantly more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 245 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng P7+ is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.3 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng P7+ delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 380 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, XPeng P7+ is moderately lighter – 1,999 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 206 kg.

Looking at boot space, the XPeng P7+ offers slightly more boot space – 573 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 105 L.

When it comes to payload, the XPeng P7+ carries markedly more – 486 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 101 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng P7+ stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,900
P7+

XPeng P7+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 245 - 503 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.2 - 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 455 - 530 km
details

Frequently compared as well

XPeng P7
XPeng P7+
VS
The XPeng P7 and P7+ are closely related electric sedans, with the P7+ positioned as a higher-spec variant that builds on the standard P7’s strengths. This short comparison highlights the key differences in range, performance, features and value to help you pick the one that best matches your …
BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
Mazda CX-6e
XPeng P7+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

XPeng P7+

The XPeng P7+ is a sleek, coupe-like electric sedan that pairs a spacious, tech-forward cabin with an easygoing yet poised driving character — think premium feel without premium smugness. Packed with clever driver aids and a refined ride that earns the odd grin on twisty roads, it’s a compelling, modern alternative to the usual premium suspects.

details
serpimg_tW3Swn

Reviews XPeng P7+

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
BYD Seal
XPeng P7+
VS
The BYD Seal and the XPeng P7+ are two sharp electric sedans from Chinese brands that deliver long range, sporty design and advanced technology at competitive prices. This comparison examines how the Seal’s efficient powertrain and rich feature set stack up against the P7+’s driver-assist …
XPeng P7+
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Comparing the XPeng P7+ and the Zeekr 7 GT puts two sporty, tech‑heavy Chinese electric sedans head-to-head, each aiming to blend performance with premium features. I’ll break down range, driving dynamics, interior quality and tech so you can decide which one fits your priorities.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
XPeng G6
XPeng P7+
VS
XPeng’s G6 and the P7+ go head-to-head in a neat battle of priorities: roomy, tech-forward practicality versus sleek, low-drag efficiency and sportier poise. For buyers it boils down to lifestyle — the G6 promises everyday versatility and family-friendly space, while the P7+ sells a more …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
Mazda CX-6e
XPeng P7+

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Price
39,900 - 45,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Electric Range
455 - 530 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Curb weight
1,999 - 2,200 kg
Trunk capacity
468 L
Trunk capacity
573 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,935 mm
Width
1,937 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 kg
Payload
485 - 486 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
258 HP
Power HP
245 - 503 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.3 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 Nm
Torque
450 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
190 kW
Power kW
180 - 370 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
XPeng
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-6e?

The Mazda CX-6e is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.