VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Ferrari 296 Roadster comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 880 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 396,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Ferrari 296 Roadster?

Mazda CX-80 vs Ferrari 296 Roadster: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
details

Ferrari 296 Roadster

  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is substantially cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Ferrari 296 Roadster costs 396,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 346,672 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ferrari 296 Roadster with 8.9 L/100km. The difference is about 4.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 60 km, about 45 km more than the Ferrari 296 Roadster.

296 Roadster

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 296 Roadster offers clearly more power – delivering 880 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 553 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 296 Roadster is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.8 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari 296 Roadster delivers clearly more torque with 755 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 205 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari 296 Roadster is noticeably lighter – 1,760 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 371 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries considerably more – 650 kg compared to 220 kg. That’s a difference of about 430 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-80
Ferrari 296 Roadster

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari 296 Roadster

The Ferrari 296 GTS marries dramatic mid‑engine styling with razor‑sharp handling and a soundtrack that insists you drive it like you stole it. With the roof down it becomes an intoxicating open‑top thoroughbred that somehow also manages to be surprisingly usable day to day — a gorgeous, grin‑inducing reminder of why people fall for Ferraris.

details
serpimg_6LXpw0

Reviews Ferrari 296 Roadster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Honda HR-V or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes SL Class
VS
Mazda CX-80 and Mercedes SL Class go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-80
Ferrari 296 Roadster

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
396,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
15 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
218 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Roadster
Seats
7
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,760 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,958 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
220 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
880 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
755 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
648 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,992 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ferrari
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.