VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Ferrari Purosangue comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 725 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 324,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Ferrari Purosangue?

Mazda CX-80 vs Ferrari Purosangue: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
details

Ferrari Purosangue

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 is substantially cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Ferrari Purosangue costs 324,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 275,420 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ferrari Purosangue with 17.1 L/100km. The difference is about 13.1 L/100km.

Purosangue

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari Purosangue offers substantially more power – delivering 725 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 398 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari Purosangue is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.3 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari Purosangue delivers visibly more torque with 692 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari Purosangue is very slightly lighter – 2,033 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 98 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ferrari Purosangue offers significantly more boot space – 473 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 215 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
Ferrari Purosangue

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari Purosangue

Ferrari Purosangue flips the script on what a Ferrari can be, marrying the brand's savage performance and intoxicating exhaust note with the space and practicality of a usable grand tourer. For buyers who crave supercar drama without sacrificing everyday comfort, the Purosangue offers theatrical driving thrills and enough presence to stop traffic at the valet.

details
serpimg_JGrs5U

Reviews Ferrari Purosangue

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
BMW X5
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the BMW X5 offers a blend of performance and opulence with its powerful engine options, refined interior, and cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, the new Mazda CX-80 presents a compelling alternative, delivering a spacious yet elegant cabin and Mazda's signature …
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-80 present compelling options for those seeking a versatile SUV. The CR-V stands out with its robust reliability and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 offers a sportier driving experience with …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Mazda CX-80
Ferrari Purosangue

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
324,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
17.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
389 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
100 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,033 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
473 L
Length
-
Length
4,973 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
2,028 mm
Height
-
Height
1,589 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
725 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
312 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
692 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
533 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
6,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ferrari
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.