VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Land Rover Range Rover?

Mazda CX-80 vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
details

Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-80 is substantially cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 75,900 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover offers substantially more range – reaching up to 116 km, about 56 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Range Rover

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers considerably more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 223 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers clearly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is somewhat lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 373 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers substantially more boot space – 818 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 560 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries markedly more – 846 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 196 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £125,200
Range Rover

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 300 - 550 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 115 - 116 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Land Rover Range Rover
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Range Rover with the Mercedes‑GLC (the electrified Mercedes‑EQ version) puts two different luxury philosophies head to head: the Range Rover offers commanding presence, traditional opulence and genuine off‑road ability, while the GLC EQ focuses on compact premium comfort, cutting‑edge …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Land Rover Range Rover

The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.

details
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_8864
Range_Rover_Batumi_Gold_D350_First_Edition_7354
Range_Rover_Belgravia_Green_D350_Autobiography_7927
Range_Rover_Interiors_8452

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
IVAN
13 May 2026, 22:08:33

Aesthetic presence but in today's world only a good hybrid or full electric should be offer..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
BMW iX
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
Unsure whether the BMW iX or the Land Rover Range Rover is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Honda CR-V
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
Unsure whether the Honda CR-V or the Land Rover Range Rover is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover
VS
In the luxury SUV realm, the Jaguar F-Pace and the Land Rover Range Rover both stand out with their own strengths. The F-Pace, with its sporty handling and sleek design, appeals to those looking for a performance-driven edge alongside luxury. Meanwhile, the Range Rover, known for its off-road …
Mazda CX-80
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
62 - 267 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
7
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
2,047 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
645 - 846 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.